The Community will be undergoing maintenance on Friday January 10 at 2:00pm - Saturday January 11 at 2:00pm EST, and will be "read-only." For assistance during this time, please visit our Help Center.
Sep 19, 2022 10:42 AM
Hello,
I have a table with about 1700 records. I’m pulling a couple of records and doing some math on all the rows, then updating the result in a new record. The bulk update code I’m using is waaaay faster than a single row update, but it’s still taking about 45-60 seconds. That’s too slow for me to run an automation, which has a 30s timeout. Is the following code inefficient?
while(updatedRecords.length){
await table.updateRecordsAsync(updatedRecords.splice(0,50));
}
Regards,
Scott
Solved! Go to Solution.
Sep 19, 2022 10:48 AM
You code isn’t inefficient. It just isn’t as efficient as you need it to be.
This thread has suggestions for dealing with updating thousands of records in an automation.
Sep 19, 2022 10:48 AM
You code isn’t inefficient. It just isn’t as efficient as you need it to be.
This thread has suggestions for dealing with updating thousands of records in an automation.
Sep 19, 2022 11:03 AM
Thank you! I don’t have to update every record, so that’s a great suggestion.
Do you have any examples of a mega batch update? I would have approached it the way it was discussed in the thread, but I got the impression that did not work.