I understand the conditions you don’t allow - referencing record links in primary field formulas - but it it far too limiting. This is a huge, very frustrating issue for me. I’ve gone at length looking at solutions to get around it, but honestly, the...
I’m constantly making tables to organize information into hierarchies. I also want them all to have the same type of information, and to be groupable/etc, so they have to be on the same table. I’ve tried working with cross-tables, but even then I run...
We’ve been asking for this feature for a very long time. To me, and I think to many, a hierarchical link type is a very fundamental feature for a database. And respectfully, making an auto-populating same-table link for hierarchies a pro feature, tha...
I’ve posted on this before. But seen no activity on it. I need this, soon if possible, because every single base of mine relies on this functionality.
I REALLY want a link-to-record within the same table to create another link column that auto-popula...
Linking records seems to me to be the least exploited, most powerful feature on Airtable.
I love the feature, but it seems to lack some continuity, IMO. Almost a head-scratcher to neglect. If I can say so respectfully. :confused:
I’m looking for th...
Another bump for this feature, please. For me, blocks are not a reasonable substitute for this, those are basically just for summaries, and this seems like a basic feature of kanban to me, not an extra like a pivot table would be.
Another vote for this feature please. This is a natural extension any user is going to want to do, and I honestly can’t understand why it wasn’t just baked in in the first place.
Really, this needs to be a feature. The same needs to apply for sorting within grid views, as well as kanban views - the ability to group records by single groups, or by multiple.
I understand this is a fundamental feature of relational databases - t...
That’s pretty close. A lot of my use cases have a cobbled together hierarchy on multiple tables (category A, item A1/A2/etc.) and I want to be able to link them together by that combined ID; or with the category IN the name just from a basic formula ...
I have used series’ of groups as well as tables for this.
The use case tends to be where it’s a more specific type of the same kind of item, that has all of the same points of data. Either way above, this becomes quite a chore to ender data manually....
