Help

Automatic Sequential Numbering of Non-Sequential Items (READ JUN 9 2021 FOLLOW-UP)

38059 64
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Summary
This setup allows Airtable to automatically number collections of items that may not be in sequential order. Item length can be either fixed or variable, with only minor changes needed to the core system to accommodate the latter.

Example
To borrow from the thread that inspired this endeavor, say you’re building product codes that have a variant sub-code, and want that sub-code to automatically increment each time an item of a given product code is added in a new record. However, it needs to auto-increment each product’s sub-code separately, even when product codes are added out of order.

For example, the first product code is 001, and its initial sub-code is 1, so the full combined code is 001-1. When you add a new variation of product 001, the sub-code bumps up by 1, creating 001-2.

Now a new product is introduced with code 002. Because it’s the first of its kind, its full combined code is 002-1. If we then introduce a third variant of product 001, it would end up with a combined code of 001-3.

So far our full product codes, in the order they were created, look like this:

001-1
001-2
002-1
001-3

For a small list, creating these manually might not be a problem, but most people don’t use Airtable with small lists. :winking_face: It would be much easier to manage if the variant codes would auto-increment each time we add a new product code.

This independent sequential numbering requires some knowledge of how many of each item came before the current one, no matter how far back in the list those previous items might live. Because each Airtable record is independent, not having any “knowledge” of any other records in the same table, there’s no direct way to reference other records to make this count. However, with a little table and field trickery (inspired by the work of @W_Vann_Hall), this can be done. The core method requires items of a fixed length, but with a minor adjustment it will also work to track items of varying lengths.

Here’s a sample base that you can copy if you wish to dig into the guts of the system, which are described below.

Core Solution
Only two tables are required:

  1. The main table recording the items to be tracked.
  2. A [Control] table with a single record.

The data requirements for this setup are:

  1. The primary field in the main table must be an Autonumber field.
  2. Every record in the main table must be linked to the lone record in the [Control] table.
  3. The character length of the data in the field containing the base items to be tracked must be the same for every record. The exact length isn’t important, but it must be consistent. For example, if you’re going to use a five-character base code, the content of that code can be pretty much anything as long as it’s unique (obviously), and always five characters long in every record. The good news is that the field type can be any number of things, including (but not limited to) Single line text, Single select, Date, Duration, Phone Number, or even a link from another table

Here’s a cropped look at the [Fixed Length] table in the sample base:

53%20PM

Here’s a rundown of how the system works. All field names are from [Fixed Length]:

  • First, a unique character is added to the base item (see the {Unique Base} field), in order to prevent accidental crossover between base items when a SUBSTITUTE is run later in the process. My sample base uses a vertical bar, but anything else can be used instead as long as it’s not part of any of the base codes.
  • These unique items are looked up in the [Control] table, and that collection is then looked up back in the main table (see the {Lookup} field).
  • That lookup is then condensed into a string, and only the leftmost portion kept, with the length based on multiplying the record’s autonumber value by the {Unique Base} length (see the {Truncated} field). For example, if {Unique Base} is four characters long, this field will only keep the first four characters of the mashed-together lookup for the first record. For the second record, it will keep the first eight characters, and so on. This creates a record-by-record tally of everything that has been added.
  • The {Substitute} field then takes that tally and removes all instances of {Unique Base}, leaving everything else except that item.
  • The length of {Substitute} is subtracted from the length of {Truncated}, then divided by the length of {Unique Base}, and we have the unique number to assign to the listed item (see the {Variant} field)
  • The variant number is combined with the base and any desired separators in the {Final} field.

The four helper fields in the main table can be hidden once everything is set up. Because the numbers assigned in the Autonumber field are maintained even when reordering records, the variant numbers remain properly assigned even after records are moved around.

Variable Length Items
The same basic system also works with items of varying lengths. However, because of that variation, we can’t use the items themselves to track their count. Instead, we need to track another fixed-length item that’s tied to that primary item. For this, I created a new table, with the item names in the primary field, an autonumber field adjacent to that, and a formula field that padded the autonumber with leading zeroes to create a unique fixed-length ID for each item. Because these IDs are only going to be used in various formulas, I also added the vertical bar character here instead of doing so in the main table.

Back in the main table, the base items became links to records in that other table, with a lookup field pulling in each item’s unique ID, and then the rest of the system flows as outlined above, operating on that ID instead of the item itself. Once the item’s unique number is calculated, it’s combined with the original item.

Here’s a sample lookup table for this variable-length system (the [Presidents] table in the sample base):

40%20PM

And here’s the main portion of the [Variable Length] table:

54%20PM

64 Replies 64

The field names match and I have been using the drop down from the formula field in order to make sure the field names are correct. The error shows up in the cells after the formula field is saved. This has to be a problem related to the field format.

This formula works (in a limited sense since the ID needs to be dynamic with the record type)
SUBSTITUTE(Truncated,“001|”,"")

This formula does not work, The brackets around the Unique Base name are interesting.
SUBSTITUTE(Truncated,{Unique Base},"")

Can you be more specific? What kind of error do you see?

When referencing a field that’s more than just a single word, or one that has emoji or other non-alphabetic characters in its name, the name must be wrapped in curly braces for the formula to operate properly.

Michiel_Haverla
4 - Data Explorer
4 - Data Explorer

Hi there! I have been looking for a good solution to my issue and I see many posts linked to this article. But looking at @Justin_Barrett instructions, I am unable to solve this.

I’m using Airtable for an administration system where people add their receipts. Every receipt needs to have a unique number. Preferably I have a SETTING view where I can set the code of the receipt and give a starting number of the sequence.

For example I will have TB1-001 (where TB1 is the code) and the 001 is set due to my starting number of the sequence, which is 1.

I can share my table to give you an insight to my challenge. Thx

Keith_Dunn
4 - Data Explorer
4 - Data Explorer

Hi, there! Total spreadsheet / Airtable n00b here. :grinning_face_with_sweat:

First, let me say that if anyone would like to reach out to help me out with this, I’d be more than happy to compensate them for their time.

I think what I’m trying to accomplish is along these lines.

Goal: A table that adds a new record numbered 1-10 and RESETS to number 1 once 10 is reached.

Reason: I run a real estate team and I need to assign them leads as they come in to our system in an equitable manner.

Background: I’m fairly fluent in Zapier and could easily send these records to Airtable but I can’t seem to find a way to distribute them to my 10 person team evenly as they come in.

Question: Is this actually a good use case for my problem or am I barking up the wrong tree? Is there a much easier solution I’m not seeing?

Spreadsheets are my kryptonite so thanks in advance for any / all insight / advice.

PS: I will totally pay you to set this up for me!

-Keith

Welcome to the community, @Michiel_Haverlag! :grinning_face_with_big_eyes: If you’re able to share a link to your base, feel free to post that here. I’m a lot busier these days with my new job, and can’t always do deep dives into problem setups, but I’m hoping this will be an easy fix.

The setup you want can be done with a much simpler setup than what I described above. In your case, you would begin by adding an Autonumber field. I often name these with a number/pound sign so I can shrink it down fairly small:

Screen Shot 2020-02-17 at 8.15.36 AM

Add a formula field with this formula:

MOD({#} + 9, 10) + 1

Which will give you this:

Screen Shot 2020-02-17 at 8.16.51 AM

Hi Justin,

That would be amazing. I have duplicated my base where you could play around:

https://airtable.com/invite/l?inviteId=invyZBCb87e7y50cA&inviteToken=5411d318faed83d12f36c4ca47cb30855985d64d7defcec5960e9c5adccd3ab1

So basically there is just one column that needs to be a sequence which needs to be plussed by one. Example: if I have 4 receipts in the table and I add a new one, the field should say 5.

If I delete no. 5 and add a new one, this integer should say 5 again. Hope it is clear to you. I don’t think it is hard mathematics for you.

Thanks in advance :slightly_smiling_face:

Michiel

Michiel,

I was about to dive into this, but after reading through your comments, one thing stuck out:

This is a known issue with the system I came up with. In a follow-up post above, I pointed out:

This is because a core element of the system is an Autonumber field, and Autonumber fields never repeat numbers, even if a record is deleted. The only way to “fix” this is to tweak the Autonumber field (as I outlined above) to reset it. This wouldn’t be much of a bother if you seldom delete records. However, If you foresee yourself deleting records regularly, you’ll have to apply this reset to the Autonumber field every time you do so, which would become more than a bit annoying IMO.

Michiel_Haverla
4 - Data Explorer
4 - Data Explorer

Hi @Justin_Barrett,

Ok. In that case we will change our workaround and won’t delete the records but change them :slightly_smiling_face: If we would do that, would that change things and could you proceed with your magic?

That will work if you don’t delete records, but just know that it may be a day or two before I can work on it. I’ve already got a very full plate at the moment.