Forecasting & Machine Learning

While scoping a new Airtable solution for a client, the topic of forecasting came up and specifically by employing machine learning. There are many definitions of machine learning and while my focus was to at least prove to myself that a Script Block could perform the forecasting process natively (i.e., without calling out to any external services), I took a stab at crafting a simple data science block to forecast sales by month for the next three years.

Setting the Table - Aggregation by Month/Year

The sales data exists in a table which includes about 3,000 transactions spanning 2018 and 2019. Instead of using roll-ups or formula fields I decided to see how well the Script Block was able to perform the aggregation of sales by year and month.

The objective is simple – total sales by month and year. The performance of this part of the process is blistering fast; about 1.3 seconds.


Forecasting Algorithm

As I mentioned, there are many AI approaches to forecasting but I self-constrained this project to allow me to keep it simple; the model has two key requirements:

  1. It must be native Script Block code;
  2. It must be able to learn as the actual sales data expands.

Many of the forecasting models in AI require GPU’s to process and employ relatively sizeable model resources. As such, I chose an algorithm that I can code in every-day javascript using triple exponential smoothing which explicitly adds support for seasonality to the univariate time series. This method is sometimes called Holt-Winters Exponential Smoothing, named for two contributors to the method: Charles Holt and Peter Winters. In addition to the alpha and beta smoothing factors, a new parameter is added called gamma (g) that controls the influence on the seasonal component.

How it "Learns"

The script is designed to utilize historical data (2018/2019) to forecast 2020. Then it automatically expands the next forecast to use three year’s data (2 historical values for each month plus one forecast value) to determine yet another forecast value. As the future inches forward and actual data expands, the forecasting process becomes increasingly more intelligent and likely more precise.

Why Not Use Formulas?

Airtable formulas are wonderful tools, but they tend to work against you in complex processes. And in some case, they expand dependencies and the number of fields in your data model to the point where it’s difficult to manage and maintain.

Examples like this make it abundantly clear - script-based blocks have a very bright future for Airtable builders because they demonstrate how to craft complex computational features that interchange with other data processes and reporting requirements. Formulaic-based processes will never be able to achieve these objectives, nor should they be expected to. Imagine how difficult it would be to replicate this script as a formula. It might be possible but it would be very ugly indeed.

The question is [rather] …

Why not make it possible for Script Blocks to become formulas?

What Next?

This example doesn’t make any assumptions about what to do with the forecasted values; that’s up to you. As a simple block app it’s useful in a variety of forecasting use cases as is. It could be applied to any time-series data as a prediction tool.

With this data and the power of integrated javascript in the block, this data grid can be updated to another table, or emailed as a report, or incorporated into many other use cases. Instantiated as a table that is updated from time-to-time, it could drive data visualizations with other blocks.


A few people have asked about the name “AirDrop”. This is just a tag name I have assigned to a class of scripts I openly share with the Airtable community. It helps me keep my script libraries organized so I can remember what has been sanitized for open sharing. “AirDrops” are not declared under an open-source license, but they are offered here for anyone to use to learn from or shape into other solutions.

Here’s the complete code… enjoy.


   Airdrop - Forecasting
   Copyright (c) 2020 by Global Technologies Corporation

// get the table name
let sourceTableName = "Sales Data";

// display app title
output.markdown('# AirDrop Forecasting');

// get the source data
let sourceTable = base.getTable(sourceTableName);

// get the data set for 2018/2019
let result = await sourceTable.selectRecordsAsync();

// set a counter for testing
var count = 0;

// build the dataframe
var aDataFrame = [];
for (var i = 1; i < 13; i++)
        "Month" : i,
        "2018" : 0,
        "2019" : 0,
        "2020" : 0,
        "2021" : 0,
        "2022" : 0

// iterate across all the records
for (let record of result.records)
  if ((record.getCellValue("MONTH_ID")) && (record.getCellValue("YEAR_ID")) && (record.getCellValue("YEAR_ID") != "2005") )
    count += 1;

// compute the future
for (var i = 0; i < aDataFrame.length; i++)
  aDataFrame[i]["2020"] = forecast(3, [aDataFrame[i]["2018"], aDataFrame[i]["2019"]], [1,2]);
  aDataFrame[i]["2021"] = forecast(4, [aDataFrame[i]["2018"], aDataFrame[i]["2019"], aDataFrame[i]["2020"]], [1,2,3]);
  aDataFrame[i]["2022"] = forecast(5, [aDataFrame[i]["2018"], aDataFrame[i]["2019"], aDataFrame[i]["2020"], aDataFrame[i]["2021"]], [1,2,3,4]);

// format the final results
for (let i in aDataFrame)
    aDataFrame[i]["2018"] = aDataFrame[i]["2018"].toFixed(0).replace(/(\d)(?=(\d\d\d)+(?!\d))/g, "$1,");
    aDataFrame[i]["2019"] = aDataFrame[i]["2019"].toFixed(0).replace(/(\d)(?=(\d\d\d)+(?!\d))/g, "$1,");
    aDataFrame[i]["2020"] = aDataFrame[i]["2020"].toFixed(0).replace(/(\d)(?=(\d\d\d)+(?!\d))/g, "$1,");
    aDataFrame[i]["2021"] = aDataFrame[i]["2021"].toFixed(0).replace(/(\d)(?=(\d\d\d)+(?!\d))/g, "$1,");
    aDataFrame[i]["2022"] = aDataFrame[i]["2022"].toFixed(0).replace(/(\d)(?=(\d\d\d)+(?!\d))/g, "$1,");

// forecast (based on triple exponential smoothing)
function forecast(x, ky, kx)
   var i=0, nr=0, dr=0,ax=0,ay=0,a=0,b=0;
   function average(ar) {
          var r=0;
      for (i=0;i<ar.length;i++){
         r = r+ar[i];
      return r/ar.length;
   for (i=0;i<kx.length;i++){
      nr = nr + ((kx[i]-ax) * (ky[i]-ay));
      dr = dr + ((kx[i]-ax)*(kx[i]-ax))
  return (a+b*x);

// display the forcasted dataframe

// update dataframe
function updateDataFrame(record)
    try {
      var yearID = parseInt(record.getCellValue("YEAR_ID")) + 15;
      var itemID  = findElement(aDataFrame, "Month", record.getCellValue("MONTH_ID"));
      aDataFrame[itemID][yearID] += record.getCellValue("SALES");
    } catch(e) {

// find an element in the aggregate list
function findElement(arr, propName, propValue)
  for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++)
    if (arr[i][propName] == propValue)
      return i;

Nice job! This is much more sophisticated than anything I could do, the scripting block seems to solve quite a few problems! I guess I’m going to have to go back to JavaScript school

1 Like

Well, it certainly kicks open a number of new doorways. Pretty much, anything is possible with an integral scripting model.

1 Like

Hello again, Bill!

Again, another brilliant tool that I’m excited to use.
However, I’m having an issue with the scripting block. I changed the table name to match my current table name that holds all of the company line items - and I added two fields MONTH_ID (just the month number) and YEAR_ID (the literal year) - this allowed the code compile, however, this is my output:

I noticed in your description of the code, you mentioned that the script forecasts data from 2018 & 19, then uses that data to predict 2020 to 2022 - I’m wondering if the presence of 2020 sales data in my table is an unexpected variable that’s confusing the compiler, and, I’m also wondering if there’s an adjustment I can make to this code so that it will extend its prediction to 2025 / or just update the parameters as we get closer to 2022.

Thank-you for your time and for making this incredible script.

Yeah, um - the errors it is echoing seem like the data is not making it into the JSON object.

Either share me into this base so I can debug, or make an export of the data (as a CSV) and also share to me the actual code and I’ll debug. Debugging from a screenshot will be near impossible.

1 Like

Thanks @Bill.French. This is such a great example of the innovation potential in this new block. I’m hitting what appears to be the same issue as @Alexander-Jerry.Leon. Keen to hear if there was a solution?
Best wishes, Neil

There were a number of issues relating to the field names used in the example and the lack of data. It’s also possible it’s a data issue as my example repurposed data behind the scenes from 2003-2004 because my client wouldn’t allow me to use actual recent data years. You can see the references in the code that simulate the more recent years using old data.

@nnnnneil -

It’s very likely this line is throwing you off track:

var yearID = parseInt(record.getCellValue("YEAR_ID")) + 15;

I added 15 to the year number because my real data started in 2003, thus making my reported year start in 2018.

Thanks @Bill.French! Got it working now :slight_smile:

1 Like

Hello @Bill.French , great work!

Would it be possible to share a template so we can copy to play with the numbers?

I’m very new to this and don’t know anything with the coding so could not figure out how to use it in my table.

Thank you!

Hi Burak! Welcome to the community!

The data I used is actual data from a client and it’s not even from the years displayed; I had to write additional algorithms to obscure the original dates/times in the sourced sales data and this is not exactly obvious in the code. As such, the intent of this shared code example is to give other coders a leg up for building similar forecasting approaches.

Indeed, this is not intended to be a solution or an example of a working solution. Rather, it’s intended to share an approach I was successful with so that other Airtable users who have coding experience.

As one reader wrote -

This is much more sophisticated than anything I could do…

Machine learning and forecasting is complex stuff and attempting to apply it is not easy, and especially not easy without some basic development skills. But this can be said for almost any use of the Script Block.

As this analysis shows, even someone with deep experience in building forecasting systems can be sideswiped by development issues. Ironically, I forecast a 4 hour effort to build this example in Script Block but it ultimately took two more than two full development days to get it right -

At the risk of sounding a bit harsh, integrating a forecasting model into your own data is likely to (a) require a keen understanding of your data and how to shape it so that machine learning can be applied, and (b) require code, and perhaps a fair bit of complex code.

I would encourage other developers in the community to expand upon this approach to create derivatives that employ exponential smoothing in a fully shared base. Unfortunately, my resources for this topic are tapped unless my boss has me on a clock developing it. :wink:

Oh I see, now it’s clear many thanks for the detailed response.

So, I hope someone in the community will publish a template that unexperienced people can use.

Fingers crossed! :slight_smile: