The Community will be undergoing maintenance on Friday January 10 at 2:00pm - Saturday January 11 at 2:00pm EST, and will be "read-only." For assistance during this time, please visit our Help Center.
I have a button field that runs a script, that calls an external API, and then updates a field in the record. Is there anyway to stop the extension dashboard containing the script from opening (even partially) when the script is run?
I really don’t n...
My organization (10-ish folks) is having problems buying into the value of more diligently managing contacts in Airtable. Airtable has been made the primary technology in the org, along with the Google ecosystem. However, it’s highly likely that a g...
For example, if you add a new field to a table/view that is currently sync’d to another base, how do you get that field to become part of the sync? Is that even possible? In this specific case, it’s a lookup field if that matters.
I tried to search ...
Does anyone have a super automated process for turning the data in a record into a formatted, multi-page document and then attaching it to the record? Using a button field in the flow would be fine, but I don’t want a new tab created. I don’t mind us...
Ok. One last idea. Use two functions - DATETIME_PARSE and DATETIME_FORMAT.DATETIME_FORMAT(DATETIME_PARSE({date field as text like your formula field}, "MMMM D, YYYY"), "MMMM D, YYYY")fingers crossed
Hi Shannon. Since your date is coming from a lookup field (second example - not sure why it changed from the first), I would try simple concatenation without the CONCATENATE formula. Something like...{Script} & " issued " & {Version Date (from Scrip...
Anyone who values Airtable as a core tech for their business should be concerned. Some of those I've helped weave Airtable into their biz workflows would be devastated to start over. One possibility is that the user base has been herded to skew towar...
Personally, while I'm not a great contributor, I have tried to answer a question here and there as time permits. However, I'm not a fan of the new community format. While my rational brain wants to "work with what's there", I find myself coming here ...
If I understood you correctly, I would then need need to populate the synonyms table with all ingredient names that already sit in the Ingredient table, right? Yes, this is what I was saying. It's not perfect, but you don't have to give up your ease ...