Skip to main content

Attaching document vs linking to Google drive url

  • November 17, 2025
  • 4 replies
  • 28 views

Forum|alt.badge.img+6

We are a nonprofit that does contracted training, and I have set up a base to track the workflow from initial inquiry to completed training (with # of participants, etc.). Still struggling to get usage, but hopefully with some recent tweaks to interfaces, that will improve.

 

I’m adding some automations to speed up the process and get more consistency- i.e. having a proposal auto-generate from the data entered, and then when final to have it auto-generate a contract. I’m using Fillout.com to gather the official info (oftentimes the contracting entity and signer are different than the person we’re working with directly), and then plan to use Docsautomator.io to generate the contract. 

 

My question is… from a “safety” standpoint, i.e. not losing essential data, do you see any difference between saving the contracts in a Google drive and using a URL field to store the link, or using an attachment field type and “inserting” the document? 

 

I do have On2Air backups set up. We are a tiny organization so there are really only 2 people I have to convince, but they are reticent to have these ONLY or even PRIMARILY in Airtable. Currently they are developing a folder system and Excel spreadsheet, which to me negates the efficiency of Airtable. 

 

What pro’s and con’s do you see of these two methods, and do you see a reason not to “trust” airtable with the attachments? 

TIA

4 replies

DisraeliGears01
Forum|alt.badge.img+21

Currently they are developing a folder system and Excel spreadsheet, which to me negates the efficiency of Airtable. 

🫠💀

Haha, toward your actual question Airtable does have some flaws in storing attachments, specifically with attachment URL behavior (officially documented here). Essentially the direct URL for sharing an attachment changes a short while after being shared, so they don’t act as permalinks. This makes Airtable attachment fields more useful for longer term internal storage or for things you’re working with inside the base, rather than things you’re trying to share outside of Airtable. I’ve never had a problem with trusting Airtable to house attachments, it's more about how Airtable works for interfacing with outside users (hence why you’re using Fillout haha). 

To that end and since you’re already incorporating extensions and 3rd party functions like Fillout and DocsAutomator, I’d probably lean toward the Google Drive storage with an Airtable URL field directing toward the Drive. You could probably do the same with OneDrive or Dropbox if those are more preferred by your team


Mike_AutomaticN
Forum|alt.badge.img+28

Hey ​@Pam_Siebert,

From a safety standpoint Airtable should be good enough! Never had any issue storing attachemnts in AT. However, do remember that Airtable does have limits on storage, depending on your airtable pricing plan. You can find attachment/storage limits per plan here.

I usually host my attachments in Airtable, and when I’m close to hitting my storage limit I get things pushed to Google Drive and bring back the url.

Completely different matter, but would love to have you join our Airtable Hackathon! Make sure to sign up!!

Mike, Consultant @ Automatic Nation 
YouTube Channel 


TheTimeSavingCo
Forum|alt.badge.img+31

Biggest pro of storing the attachments on Airtable would be being able to view it in Airtable, really.  Being able to just click and view the PDF beats loading a new tab

---

Safety wise, I haven’t had any issues with data loss.  Given their reticence it’s probably simpler to just toggle on the functionality in DocsAutomator to save the generated Doc / PDF on Google Drive and call it a day instead of trying to convince them otherwise though

 


ScottWorld
Forum|alt.badge.img+35
  • Genius
  • November 18, 2025

@Pam_Siebert 

Some thoughts here:

1. Airtable’s interfaces lets you display previews of externally-hosted images within Airtable itself based on their URLs, so that might be very helpful for you if you store your files in Google Drive. (I’m not sure if this works for documents too, or just images.)

2. Airtable has relatively low attachment storage limits, so if you’ll be storing a lot of files, it’s probably best to use Google Drive, and you can automate the whole process of getting those links into Airtable with Make’s Google Drive integrations.

3. You’re already using Fillout, which can also automatically feed your attachments into Google Drive as well.

- ScottWorld, Expert Airtable Consultant