Skip to main content

TL;DR:

I’m a non-technical cartoonist who built a fully chat-controlled editorial system using Airtable’s API and OpenAI Actions (via ChatGPT Teams). I can manage my entire cartoon workflow—images, captions, submissions, rights, and tagging—just by talking to it. No middleware, no third-party tools. It handles flexible inputs, reads image fields, and edits any table or field naturally. Happy to share details if anyone’s doing something similar.

Why I built it:

I draw single-panel, black-and-white gag cartoons (like what you’d find in The New Yorker). I needed a way to track and submit work, manage captions, analyze themes, and stay organized across multiple stages of a cartoon’s life. I had no editor or agent—so I built one.

What it does:

  • Reads and analyzes cartoon images alongside their captions
  • Tags tone, subjectivity, and humor style
  • Edits any field across multiple linked tables (submissions, rights, cooldowns, etc.)
  • Works from vague or partial prompts like:
    • “Update BalloonBomb’s caption to ‘Oh no!’ and retag it”
    • “Find cartoons tagged ‘Posthumous Irony’ submitted to The New Yorker in the last 90 days”
    • “Describe Cartoon X’s image and store it in the record”

How it works:

  • All actions are native OpenAI API calls, no Zapier or automation tools
  • Authenticated through ChatGPT Teams
  • Airtable serves as the backend for a multimodal editorial brain
  • I even log key GPT conversations into Airtable-linked Google Docs to retain context
  • I built a New Yorker issue analyzer to track trends over time

What started as a tracker became a fully interactive editorial system—and after years of failure, I finally got published.

I’d love to hear if anyone else is using Airtable this way or thinking about creative pipelines. Always open to feedback, collaboration, or mutual nerding out.

 

Be the first to reply!