Is it possible to have images in automatic emails?

Topic Labels: Automations
9368 16
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
5 - Automation Enthusiast
5 - Automation Enthusiast


I am wondering whether it is possible to add an image to the body of the emails that are sent using automation? I want to add the logo of the company to the signature.


16 Replies 16

Hi @Amir-Homayoun_Javadi - no, is doesn’t look like you can do this. Although the email body field supports markdown, it doesn’t support image markdown. This would work in a .md file:


But it doesn’t work in the email action. This ties in with this article which makes no mention of images.

Actually, Airtable quietly added support for images in automation emails a while ago. You use an html image tag. You can even set the height and width of the image (unlike in markdown).

Per the bottom of this support article

We support using Markdown syntax and a variety of HTML tags within your emails to ensure things are formatted the way you’d like. We currently support using the following HTML tags: <b> , <br> <u> , <strong> , <em> , <img> , <a> and <span> tags. You can also include inline CSS by adding a style attribute to your HTML tags.

5 - Automation Enthusiast
5 - Automation Enthusiast

Jonathan and Kuovonne, thanks for your reply. Much appreciated.

@kuovonne - I tried a regular html <img> tag too, but this doesn’t work for me either. Did you get this working?

Oh I see why this didn’t work. It is a bug really. This image:

has underscores in it and it doesn’t render.

This image (no underscores) does:

And by chance I had picked one with underscores

I’ve done it a while ago. I put the entire body of my message in a long text field and then included only that one field in the message body. If you try to put it in piecemeal, you might experience some variations.

I recall that including links in emails sometimes had problems too and needed escaping. Airtable got confused and would think that the underscores were markdown syntax.

Yep - I think that’s what it is doing. As it is inside the src attribute at this point, you would think it would deal with this, but a bug that can be workaround I guess, without too much issue. As you say, forming the full html content in a long text field is also a nice way of doing this

@kuovonne sorry, this might be a very simple question. But how do you “put the entire body of the message in a long text field and then included only that one field in the message body”? Can you copy-paste a sample here? Thanks.