Yes.
No. You can share just an Interface (no access to the underlying base), but each person who has edit privileges will still cost $20 a month.
Yes.
No. You can share just an Interface (no access to the underlying base), but each person who has edit privileges will still cost $20 a month.
@Kamille_Parks, thank you for answering. I was afraid it was like that, but hopefully Airtable will change this policy and enable external usage of interfaces.
I made the mistake of thinking that giving a user edit access to an interface - but NOT to the underlying Airtable Base - would not count as a chargeable user. I thought that was the whole point of not giving access to the base.
Alas no - just realised after a little testing that even just allowing someone to comment costs $20 a month.
Not feasible if I want to let 10 people just comment. Can't pay $200 p/month just for that - it's ridiculous.
I wanted to do it all from within Airtable - but it is just not cost effective. Will have to reluctantly use glideapps.com (or similar) - which costs in the region of $25 p/month for 1,000 users. https://www.glideapps.com/pricing
I made the mistake of thinking that giving a user edit access to an interface - but NOT to the underlying Airtable Base - would not count as a chargeable user. I thought that was the whole point of not giving access to the base.
Alas no - just realised after a little testing that even just allowing someone to comment costs $20 a month.
Not feasible if I want to let 10 people just comment. Can't pay $200 p/month just for that - it's ridiculous.
I wanted to do it all from within Airtable - but it is just not cost effective. Will have to reluctantly use glideapps.com (or similar) - which costs in the region of $25 p/month for 1,000 users. https://www.glideapps.com/pricing
Totaly Agree ! I hope this will change soon, because it is not really smart.
That's a shame! I was trapped in the same way.