The Community will be temporarily unavailable starting on Friday February 28. We’ll be back as soon as we can! To learn more, check out our Announcements blog post.
Dear all, when I prepare the message of a mail to be sent in an automation, some field (eg.: coming from a column with formula (concatenate)) are different from the original.In particulare the character "_" is lost and even "\\" is changed to "\".Les...
Dear all,I'm using the calendar in the interface; in the month view, if there are more items, accondingly to the zoom setting, only some items are visible, while others are not visible, even though the label "+ x more" is present.Even by clicking in ...
Dear Sirs,I have the table "General" in which I select the records from another table "People" (in the same base) - via link.Then I've synced (bi-diretionally) the table "General" to a different base ("2024"); the problem is that all the fileds in "2...
Dear all,when I recall the records of a base table (es. company) in a record of a second table (goods), I need to filter the former directly in the windows of recalling; if I insert the chatacter "*" it is not seen as "any character" but as is and th...
Dear all,when I create a record from a form, I need that a field of #Number type is populated with a default value of 1.Unfortunately this does not happen and the cell remains empty; only if I create the record directly from the Grid the default is i...
Dear TheTimeSavingCo and all,I'm trying to by-pass the formatting but it seems that it is not possible to let the character "_" be visible. Have you any tips? THank you. best regards A. Borriero
Dear TheTimeSavingCo,thank you very much; you are right.Actually, now I've seen that actually the word after "_" is italic.THank you again.Best regards. A. Borriero
Dear Scott,thank you for the advice; actually in the calendar of the DATA section the items are fixed and visible by clicking; only in the interface that happens. Best regards. A. Borriero
Dear ScottWorld,thank you for the prompt response. Actually I'm using the two-ways sync and all the fileds (with the exception of the one described) are indeed updated even if I modify them from the source of from the destination.For the field object...