Unfortunately, this is one of the biggest & most frustrating limitations of Airtable. You can only search linked records based on their primary field value. You may want to submit this as a feature request to support@airtable.com.

The workaround for this is to use a formula field for the primary field that concatenates all of the fields that you would ever want to search on.

Alternatively, for an external solution to this problem, you could use Fillout, which lets you specify as many fields as you want that will be searchable in linked record fields.

Hi David, could you tell me more about the workflow you’ve created to re-relate records between the two tables? (Screenshots would be great!) With that information it may be possible to create a weird workaround of some sort

Off the top of my head, assuming you’re allowing the user to pick a record that needs to be re-related from Table 1, and you’ve got a Grid element to Table 2 that allows users to filter / look for the records it needs to be related to, you could:

1. Add a checkbox to Table 2 and ask your users to mark that checkbox


2. Create a button on the Interface that will run an automation that would look for all records in Table 2 with a marked checkbox and the link them to the record in Table 1
   

This assumes only one person will ever be doing this at a time though

Hi there @Adam_TheTimeSavingCo I am currently using a workaround, but i was asking if it was possible to avoid that, to do it natively.

Your workaround seems unnecessarily complicated if i understand it correctly. I simply added a second link field (“temporary link field”). Whenever someone links a record via this field, an automation is triggerred which will simply take that link and overwrite the original link field with that link. No need for more buttons or checkboxes or so…

PS: to clarify: the interface i build (using airtables “interface” feature) is used for screening and verifying records irrespective of this re-linking issue. the fact that a record might be linked to a wrong record in a different table is just one of the checks that the people screening the records are doing. the interface is not solely for re-linking, it is for screening records in general.

FYI

Hi David! Hmm, I believe I misunderstood and thought we were looking for a way to:

1. Filter records in Table 2 that matched criteria we wanted


2. Have that filtered set of records linked to a single record of our choosing


3. Do this via an Interface

Sorry about that!

Can you provide a small example or a bit more detail on how this would work?  I've got a primary record with three fields concatenated, but I'm having trouble linking to them. Is there a specific way to use the link?

Hi Scott - do you happen to know of any other workarounds for this since this comment? Thanks!

@Meredith_Scrog1 

Yes, for an external solution to this problem, you could use Fillout, which lets you specify as many fields as you want that will be searchable in linked record fields.