Skip to main content

URL--Text to Display Feature


Show first post

163 replies

  • New Participant
  • 4 replies
  • March 13, 2019

plus 1. Also, does anyone know if you can currently have a url field entered in a page designer block be clickable?



  • 1 , Plus one, I would like the feature to be customized, for example when you enter a tracking number for UPS/Fed Ex you can click the text and can be customized to do let say a google search for that tracking number.


  • New Participant
  • 1 reply
  • June 17, 2019
Kendrick_Molina wrote:

  • 1 , Plus one, I would like the feature to be customized, for example when you enter a tracking number for UPS/Fed Ex you can click the text and can be customized to do let say a google search for that tracking number.


Having a link a being able to specify the display text is very useful for usability and readability


Can’t believe this isn’t already a feature. Definitely needed.


Yep, I agree, this may very well be a deal breaker for me. Unfortunate.


  • New Participant
  • 2 replies
  • August 29, 2019

I am somewhat amazed that this isn’t possible. I tried doing a regular HTML link using <a and so forth, and that didn’t work either.


I’ve got some hyperlinks that are crazy long (links to data in Evernote), and putting them into a cell just looks ridiculous. And, if I want to link within text, I can’t do it.


Loving Airtable for the most part, but this just seems nuts that it’s not implemented.


  • New Participant
  • 1 reply
  • October 17, 2019

+1 for me, too. Organizing information and making it accessible is what databases are all about. When I have multiple hyperlinks associated with a single record, I’d not only like it to look cleaner, but replacing link text is crucial to this being usable.


  • Inspiring
  • 3264 replies
  • October 17, 2019
Jared_Evans wrote:

+1 for me, too. Organizing information and making it accessible is what databases are all about. When I have multiple hyperlinks associated with a single record, I’d not only like it to look cleaner, but replacing link text is crucial to this being usable.



It’s funny - companies - by and large - tend to struggle to understand customer needs. Here’s a case where there is no ambiguity, the request was made a third of a decade ago, and the feature in question is proven, used in many products, and a common approach to improving data usability. Yet, here we are begging for something that ostensibly goes without saying.


But, we have a cool new web clipper. [sigh]


Airtable has clearly demonstrated a very deep skill set for building really useful stuff, but they need to make better choices concerning priorities.


Just sayin…


Kamille_Parks11
Forum|alt.badge.img+15
Bill_French wrote:

It’s funny - companies - by and large - tend to struggle to understand customer needs. Here’s a case where there is no ambiguity, the request was made a third of a decade ago, and the feature in question is proven, used in many products, and a common approach to improving data usability. Yet, here we are begging for something that ostensibly goes without saying.


But, we have a cool new web clipper. [sigh]


Airtable has clearly demonstrated a very deep skill set for building really useful stuff, but they need to make better choices concerning priorities.


Just sayin…


@Bill.French While this doesn’t invalidate your point about it taking so long to implement, this specific feature (URLs with custom display text) is in beta now along with about 5 other highly requested features (i.e. bold/italic text, headings, bulleted/numbered lists, checklists, code blocks). I imagine it took so long since their apparent approach was to tackle them all in one solution:



  • Inspiring
  • 3264 replies
  • October 17, 2019
Kamille_Parks11 wrote:

@Bill.French While this doesn’t invalidate your point about it taking so long to implement, this specific feature (URLs with custom display text) is in beta now along with about 5 other highly requested features (i.e. bold/italic text, headings, bulleted/numbered lists, checklists, code blocks). I imagine it took so long since their apparent approach was to tackle them all in one solution:




It’s great to hear there’s progress forthcoming.


But I would like to add that product management is a really key influencer in growing the customer base by ensuring priorities are carefully measured. For example …


A feature such as bold/italic text, while needed and certainly expected, is just one feature. In contrast - stark contrast actually - is a string method like Split() which has vast and deep-reaching impact on the ability to create new features and solve many data management challenges. Split() would resolve more than two dozen “feature” shortcomings of the product.


Product management should have ranked the importance of Split() (which was requested a full half-decade ago) well above a web clipper and perhaps more critical than bold/italic text.


This is the difference between features that help and features that help people help themselves, the latter of which tend to be boundless.


Kamille_Parks11 wrote:

@Bill.French While this doesn’t invalidate your point about it taking so long to implement, this specific feature (URLs with custom display text) is in beta now along with about 5 other highly requested features (i.e. bold/italic text, headings, bulleted/numbered lists, checklists, code blocks). I imagine it took so long since their apparent approach was to tackle them all in one solution:




Thanks for the heads up!


Kamille_Parks11
Forum|alt.badge.img+15
Bill_French wrote:

It’s great to hear there’s progress forthcoming.


But I would like to add that product management is a really key influencer in growing the customer base by ensuring priorities are carefully measured. For example …


A feature such as bold/italic text, while needed and certainly expected, is just one feature. In contrast - stark contrast actually - is a string method like Split() which has vast and deep-reaching impact on the ability to create new features and solve many data management challenges. Split() would resolve more than two dozen “feature” shortcomings of the product.


Product management should have ranked the importance of Split() (which was requested a full half-decade ago) well above a web clipper and perhaps more critical than bold/italic text.


This is the difference between features that help and features that help people help themselves, the latter of which tend to be boundless.


Not to belabor a point, but that beta is not just making bold/italic text and solves the request at hand (“pretty urls”). I say this for the benefit of someone reading this thread which has now veered into unrelated feature requests.


  • Inspiring
  • 3264 replies
  • October 18, 2019
Kamille_Parks11 wrote:

Not to belabor a point, but that beta is not just making bold/italic text and solves the request at hand (“pretty urls”). I say this for the benefit of someone reading this thread which has now veered into unrelated feature requests.



Indeed, my intention is not to distract from the featured requested. This is an important one as well - one that I also need desperately.


  • New Participant
  • 2 replies
  • November 8, 2019
Andrew11 wrote:

Hey Samantha,


Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. We’re looking to update our text editing experience soon, to provide better formatting which would include link title editing.


+1 Please release this feature, it will make the table easy to read.


  • Participating Frequently
  • 5 replies
  • November 29, 2019
Bill_French wrote:

Indeed, my intention is not to distract from the featured requested. This is an important one as well - one that I also need desperately.



was this ever implemented? I have url links in my table. The table is displayed on webapp. I wish the visitors on my webappp see only a text instead of the url. Is this possible yet?


  • Participating Frequently
  • 5 replies
  • November 29, 2019
Kamille_Parks11 wrote:

Not to belabor a point, but that beta is not just making bold/italic text and solves the request at hand (“pretty urls”). I say this for the benefit of someone reading this thread which has now veered into unrelated feature requests.



was this ever implemented? I have url links in my table. The table is displayed on webapp. I wish the visitors on my webappp see only a text instead of the url. Is this possible yet?


  • Inspiring
  • 3264 replies
  • November 29, 2019
Rubal_Verma wrote:

was this ever implemented? I have url links in my table. The table is displayed on webapp. I wish the visitors on my webappp see only a text instead of the url. Is this possible yet?



If by “this” you mean the ability to split a string into an array, no.



If by “my web app” you mean a custom web app that display links stored in Airtable, Split() has nothing to do with how you render links on a custom web app.


Instead of rendering raw link values in your web app, simply use HTML to display a label.


< a href='[airtableLinkValue]'>[label]</a>


Kamille_Parks11
Forum|alt.badge.img+15
Rubal_Verma wrote:

was this ever implemented? I have url links in my table. The table is displayed on webapp. I wish the visitors on my webappp see only a text instead of the url. Is this possible yet?


The URL Text to Display feature hasn’t been officially added yet, it is still in beta. You can sign up for the beta using the link below, which will give you access to the feature (with some other ancillary features as well). I have no idea of the timeline for when they make the feature official.




A note: this is not for the URL field type. You’ll have a new field type available called Rich Text Fields, which will allow you to type in some text (i.e. “Click Here”), and when you highlight the text there’s an option to add a URL to it.


  • New Participant
  • 1 reply
  • December 4, 2019
Kamille_Parks11 wrote:

The URL Text to Display feature hasn’t been officially added yet, it is still in beta. You can sign up for the beta using the link below, which will give you access to the feature (with some other ancillary features as well). I have no idea of the timeline for when they make the feature official.




A note: this is not for the URL field type. You’ll have a new field type available called Rich Text Fields, which will allow you to type in some text (i.e. “Click Here”), and when you highlight the text there’s an option to add a URL to it.


Thanks !

Looks like a solution, i’ve just filled the form 🙂


  • New Participant
  • 1 reply
  • December 16, 2019
Kamille_Parks11 wrote:

The URL Text to Display feature hasn’t been officially added yet, it is still in beta. You can sign up for the beta using the link below, which will give you access to the feature (with some other ancillary features as well). I have no idea of the timeline for when they make the feature official.




A note: this is not for the URL field type. You’ll have a new field type available called Rich Text Fields, which will allow you to type in some text (i.e. “Click Here”), and when you highlight the text there’s an option to add a URL to it.


Thank you! As a brand new Airtable user who’s taking it for a test drive for a bigger project next year, this was the first clearly missing feature I ran into. Glad it’s on the way. I just signed up for the beta.


  • Participating Frequently
  • 5 replies
  • December 24, 2019
Bill_French wrote:

If by “this” you mean the ability to split a string into an array, no.



If by “my web app” you mean a custom web app that display links stored in Airtable, Split() has nothing to do with how you render links on a custom web app.


Instead of rendering raw link values in your web app, simply use HTML to display a label.


< a href='[airtableLinkValue]'>[label]</a>


Thanks Bill. Unfortunately it wont work because I am displaying the airtable on my webpage.


  • Inspiring
  • 3264 replies
  • December 24, 2019
Rubal_Verma wrote:

Thanks Bill. Unfortunately it wont work because I am displaying the airtable on my webpage.



There are two ways to display the data in a table on a web page - (i) embedding it, and (ii) rendering the content with the API. Which approach are you using?


  • Participating Frequently
  • 5 replies
  • December 28, 2019
Bill_French wrote:

There are two ways to display the data in a table on a web page - (i) embedding it, and (ii) rendering the content with the API. Which approach are you using?





We are embedding it, using the share form link, please see attached images. I appreciate your response.

Sorry for the delay, I wanted to create a sample for you.


  • Inspiring
  • 3264 replies
  • December 28, 2019
Rubal_Verma wrote:




We are embedding it, using the share form link, please see attached images. I appreciate your response.

Sorry for the delay, I wanted to create a sample for you.



Understood - and in that case, you have no choice except to display the features that exist in Airtable.



I understand. Please re-read Kamille’s response.


  • Participating Frequently
  • 5 replies
  • December 28, 2019
Bill_French wrote:

Understood - and in that case, you have no choice except to display the features that exist in Airtable.



I understand. Please re-read Kamille’s response.


Thank you. i appreciate your time.


Reply