Showing ideas with label Interface Designer.
Show all ideas
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Oct 29, 2024
12:03 PM
Submitted by
saknapp
on
‎Oct 29, 2024
12:03 PM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b04a6/b04a6c28e68c04f8b1e037b015096fe5e61b22ca" alt="4 - Data Explorer 4 - Data Explorer"
What is the proposed idea/solution? Only allow certain interface page groups to be visible to specific users How does is solve the user problems? Not everyone on large teams needs to see all the information How was this validated? Some fields are visible to all that do not need/want to be Who is the target audience? Enterprise users with multiple teams working in a base
... View more
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Oct 27, 2024
07:42 AM
Submitted by
Tito_Alverio
on
‎Oct 27, 2024
07:42 AM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b12e5/b12e564afd47ca01c7bf11a101ecf7f5f1cfca26" alt="6 - Interface Innovator 6 - Interface Innovator"
What is the proposed idea/solution? When designing interfaces, if I create a button to create new records, the form does not allow for new options in single-select fields. I know there are workarounds, but a better idea is just to give designers the option via a toggle when in the "Edit pages" designer for forms. This toggle already exists in Interface Designer, (screenshot attached). Please include it for when designing forms within Interfaces. How does is solve the user problems? Makes users' lives easier. Enhances Airtable's capabilities. Currently they have to do workaround that involve multiple steps, and I'd rather not make a process take 3 steps when 1 would do. How was this validated? ? Who is the target audience? Everyone using the Interface forms.
... View more
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Oct 24, 2024
10:00 AM
Submitted by
MichaelSargent
on
‎Oct 24, 2024
10:00 AM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b12e5/b12e564afd47ca01c7bf11a101ecf7f5f1cfca26" alt="6 - Interface Innovator 6 - Interface Innovator"
Currently, if you have multiple layouts of an open record panel that are used in a variety of places, when you go to delete a layout, it will only tell you where it's being used. That's all fine and well but then you have to go hunt down each individual place where that's being used which, depending on the size of your interface(s), can be nearly impossible which means you're removing the ability to click into records in those locations. There should be an option when deleting an open record panel layout to default all locations that are using **bleep** to change to another layout of your choice. This would tremendously help consolidating layouts. If Airtable really wanted to tackle this problem (which of course would be an Enterprise, possibly Business plan feature) would be a central place that manages all layouts for all datasets. But at the minimum, all Airtable users should have a 'default to another layout' option when deleting a layout.
... View more
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Oct 23, 2024
11:45 AM
Submitted by
Daniel_Selzer
on
‎Oct 23, 2024
11:45 AM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/688db/688dbec3550d13df2de29a54bd8dfd3507244a06" alt="5 - Automation Enthusiast 5 - Automation Enthusiast"
In interface designer using a standard view, I can turn off field labels, but when I'm in grid or gallery views, and click to enter a specific record, I can't turn off those same labels. They are redundant and add clutter and I'd love to be able to turn them off.
... View more
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Oct 15, 2024
04:08 AM
Submitted by
Ramosh
on
‎Oct 15, 2024
04:08 AM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/688db/688dbec3550d13df2de29a54bd8dfd3507244a06" alt="5 - Automation Enthusiast 5 - Automation Enthusiast"
It is possible to impersonate a user while building/previewing Interfaces. Unfortunately impersonation is limited to the visibility of records, but doesn't consider the impersonee's permissions. E.g. an admin that impersonates a read-only user can still change the value of a field through an automation triggered by a button. Respecting the impersonee's permissions at least in preview mode would be very helpful for building interfaces.
... View more
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Oct 13, 2024
11:57 PM
Submitted by
Ccrln
on
‎Oct 13, 2024
11:57 PM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/688db/688dbec3550d13df2de29a54bd8dfd3507244a06" alt="5 - Automation Enthusiast 5 - Automation Enthusiast"
It would be nice to be able to customize the content of tooltip in Interface charts by selecting another fields to be displayed in the tooltip.
... View more
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Oct 08, 2024
02:03 AM
Submitted by
SamGluck
on
‎Oct 08, 2024
02:03 AM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b12e5/b12e564afd47ca01c7bf11a101ecf7f5f1cfca26" alt="6 - Interface Innovator 6 - Interface Innovator"
Feature Request: It would be great if Airtable scripting blocks or button fields could support browser-level JavaScript interactions, including: window.open() Functionality: Allow scripts or buttons to open external links in small, controlled windows. Custom In-Page Pop-Ups (Modals): Allow scripts or buttons to create in-page pop-ups (modals) that provide real-time feedback, confirmation messages, alerts, or custom input forms directly inside the Airtable interface. This would create a smoother user experience without opening new tabs or navigating away from Airtable. Redirect to Created Record: Enable the ability to automatically redirect users to a newly created or updated record after completing an action (such as a form submission or automation). This would enhance navigation and user flow. Use Case Examples: Fillout.com Forms: I want to click a button in Airtable to open a Fillout.com form in a small window instead of a new tab, similar to Google’s login pop-ups. In-Page Pop-Ups and Alerts: If a user changes the status of a task (e.g., from "In Progress" to "Completed"), a pop-up could appear prompting them to fill out additional fields (e.g., feedback or completion notes) before the change is confirmed. This ensures necessary data is captured right when it’s needed, without leaving the Airtable interface. Redirect to Created Record: After an automation or script creates a new record, automatically redirect the user to that record for immediate viewing or editing, streamlining workflow.
... View more
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Oct 01, 2024
03:02 AM
Submitted by
SamGluck
on
‎Oct 01, 2024
03:02 AM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b12e5/b12e564afd47ca01c7bf11a101ecf7f5f1cfca26" alt="6 - Interface Innovator 6 - Interface Innovator"
What is the proposed idea/solution? Currently we've got the option of formatting a formula field as a single select, I'd like to format it as a muliple choice How does is solve the user problems? I'd use this feature for labeling records with what fields still need to be filled. Lets say the Name and Email fields are empty, it would show at the top of the record red labels of what information still needs to be filled in the record, and as you enter the info, the labels disappear. Yes you can use automations with a script for this, but it doesn't work instant. it takes 10-15 seconds per run. using a formula would be instant.
... View more
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Sep 26, 2024
01:06 PM
Submitted by
Joseph_Roza
on
‎Sep 26, 2024
01:06 PM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0900/f0900ded0af83da2dc6601142ed7db9f90f49858" alt="8 - Airtable Astronomer 8 - Airtable Astronomer"
What is the proposed idea/solution? Extend controls for users with editor access to interfaces to be able to make columns wider and even move fields in the interface Grid view, just as it works in the database view. How does is solve the user problems? Right now, you can't make columns wider, which is even more restrictive than the list view of interfaces. I think having some additional controls over the grid view will make it appeal to certain users more familiar with spreadsheets and give them more of a sense of control. How was this validated? Users more familiar with Airtable have found some interfaces to be more restrictive than they prefer, even if they enjoy interfaces. Especially the grid view, which is so powerful in the base, is especially limiting in the interface. Who is the target audience? Users more familiar with spreadsheets. Users with some experience in Airtable. Commercial clients who want a bit more flexibility than is currently available on the grid view.
... View more
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Sep 26, 2024
12:58 PM
Submitted by
Joseph_Roza
on
‎Sep 26, 2024
12:58 PM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0900/f0900ded0af83da2dc6601142ed7db9f90f49858" alt="8 - Airtable Astronomer 8 - Airtable Astronomer"
What is your idea? Create a new role for users with interface-only access called Designer or something. These users could edit interface pages, show/hide fields, and even edit fields as necessary. They wouldn't be able to access the database or automations, or even add pages, but could modify existing pages as necessary. What Problem would it Solve? Users would be able to change values of some fields that they otherwise wouldn't be able to: single select, multiple select, etc. which can be helpful for users who accidentally create a value in these fields which are mispelled or have the wrong color etc. Users would be able to make minor cosmetic changes and move fields around as necessary. Less time would be taken from developers for making modest changes and fixing simple mistakes Who would benefit? I think this would give some users a sense of control over their apps, so they're not entirely locked to users with editor/creator access. Especially for more minor issues - like fixing incorrect single select fields - having to wait for a user who is a creator to fix those fields or update colors might be considered a minor annoyance for users. It would also appeal to users who consider themselves more designers than database engineers and give them an intro into airtable app development. It would also save time for base creators who may be managing multiple apps so they don't have to focus on more minor things that are easily fixable.
... View more