Skip to main content

Incoming webhooks for automations ✨


Show first post

52 replies

Karlstens
Forum|alt.badge.img+20
  • Inspiring
  • 601 replies
  • July 18, 2022
Jason11 wrote:

I’ll check with our team and let you know!


I found myself spending the entire weekend learning and testing Airtable Webhooks with automations. They’re working well, and very fast too.

I too would like to see an option to allow the ability to also send data to the webhook via a simple URL parameters. Had to laugh that this is one of the first things I noted that could be needed, and yup, found this thread, and there’s the first post by @ScottWorld requesting the same feature. :joy:

From those who are more advanced users of Webhooks, what other features are still needed?


Karlstens
Forum|alt.badge.img+20
  • Inspiring
  • 601 replies
  • July 23, 2022
Karlstens wrote:

I found myself spending the entire weekend learning and testing Airtable Webhooks with automations. They’re working well, and very fast too.

I too would like to see an option to allow the ability to also send data to the webhook via a simple URL parameters. Had to laugh that this is one of the first things I noted that could be needed, and yup, found this thread, and there’s the first post by @ScottWorld requesting the same feature. :joy:

From those who are more advanced users of Webhooks, what other features are still needed?


Good evening @Jason - I’m unable to consume the Webhook Body contents within a nested Find Records conditional action - but interestingly enough it appears to accept the body content outside of a conditional action, as per screenshot;

Just figured I’d report it - not sure if it’s an intended limitation or bug.

What else is planned for the Webhooks? Any new features or upcoming beta release?

EDIT: whoops, I needed to pass a Number from my body, not a stringified number, my mistake :grinning_face_with_sweat: . This is too rad!!!

My original questions on beta still remain open. :grinning_face_with_big_eyes:


Reply