What is the proposed idea/solution? Seperate the revision history from the comments section How does is solve the user problems? For me personally, I find it challenging to track the comments amid the revision history. We are a team that often make many changes to an item, and the scrolling required to get to an original comment is oddly time-consuming. The revision history is amazing, but since they are combined, it makes it more challenging.  How was this validated? My own experiences.  Who is the target audience? Everyone ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? Please add options for background field/record colors and bold text. How does is solve the user problems? Makes our massive base data table that links to everything else much more easily to scroll through and find/intake information quickly. How was this validated?   Who is the target audience? Anyone maintaining data in Airtable. ... View more

I use Airtable to log assets, This means a lot of very similar columns to log data. It would be amazing to be able to use the field manager to select a number of columns (Fields) and duplicate them, meaning it would just need re-naming. But all the Options for multi selections etc. would carry across. This would be an amazing feature for me! ... View more

My company is compliant with certain certifications and requires our team to use other platforms for certain document storage. It would be phenomenal to add pinned links / notes to tables if someone so choose, then a person can more quickly get the intention behind a table, or quickly redirect to a link of their choice  ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? The ability to group tabs within a base to keep it in order How does is solve the user problems? More efficient - tabs are grouped How was this validated? I don't understand what I should put here sorry 🙂  Who is the target audience? Airtable users ... View more

While on the homepage, all the bases are crammed into a list or a grid in an untidy manner. Please introduce a higher hierarchy to introduce teams. Teams are creating their own set of bases which can be seen in one expansion, rather than scrolling through the entire page to see your specific base. ... View more

I would be interested in having the choice to use a fixed-width font for specific fields (in data and interfaces). This would be particularly interested for fields containing SKUs for instance. ... View more

I love using Single & Multiple Select Fields when designing my bases. This option helps keep the data consistent and saves data entry time. My list of possible options usually is long in these fields and I am struggling to edit them in the space provided in the pop-up window.   I am particular about the way I sort them. Sometime alphabetically doesn't do the trick and I need to manual drag and drop them in order. However, I am finding this very hard to do bc the window size of the Single & Multiple Field Editor is so small... I can basically only see 2-3 lines at a time. Also, sometimes I want to see the whole list at one time so I can make evaluations on the content within each list and what needs to be edited or removed.   I looked to find a way to expand the Single & Multiple Field Editor, but the feedback that I received through the AT Community was the only way to do this was through the Kanban view or possibly a 3rd Party extension.   Would it be possible for AT to update the design of the Single & Multiple Field Editor Window and allow the ability to drag a corner of the window to make the Editor window bigger? Or open another window to allow editing of these fields.   Also, I would like to be able to move the fields while sorting using the up and down arrow keys. I find it hard to control w/ the mouse/drag feature.   In other Dbase programs I've worked with, the ability to edit these fields is a lot easier because of better program design. AT has a lot going for it, and I am surprised this feature isn't designed to be more user-friendly.   Thank you for the consideration! ... View more

I would like to be able to add a field that includes attributes of the collaborators entered within a "user" or "created by" or "last modified by" type of field. For example if George is entered as a collaborator in a field in table X of base Y and George belongs to a user admin group called "Sales" I would like to look up the user group George belongs to and automatically show it in another field of the same entry in table X of base Y. ... View more