Showing ideas with label Interface Designer.
Show all ideas
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Jan 30, 2025
09:14 PM
Submitted by
Mike_AutomaticN
on
‎Jan 30, 2025
09:14 PM
![10 - Mercury 10 - Mercury](/html/@3E2B981D004C65386E7C71F08391F0C2/rank_icons/Rank-Mercury.png)
List views within interfaces, and List page layouts do not support/show the sum of values of a given field (e.g. number, currency, etc). However, this is actually supported for grid views. -see comparison in image below. Even if something similar can be achieved using different workarounds as mentioned by @ScottWorld and @ATSolutionist in this other post submitted by @Scott_Brasted, a native out of the box solution seems completely needed. Mike, Consultant @ Automatic Nation
... View more
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Jan 07, 2025
11:48 AM
Submitted by
Michael_Andrew
on
‎Jan 07, 2025
11:48 AM
![8 - Airtable Astronomer 8 - Airtable Astronomer](/html/@8B0B6143080A349E4F5B6E12C21C6051/rank_icons/Rank-Astronomer.png)
I would be great if we could add buttons or links at the top of an interface sidesheets/full sheet record detail view to 'jump' to groups within the sheet. For record details sheets that are pretty long, this would be useful.
... View more
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Nov 28, 2024
03:57 AM
Submitted by
Mike_AutomaticN
on
‎Nov 28, 2024
03:57 AM
![10 - Mercury 10 - Mercury](/html/@3E2B981D004C65386E7C71F08391F0C2/rank_icons/Rank-Mercury.png)
What is the proposed idea/solution? Allowing forms to create NEW linked records, rather than only allowing to select from a list of already existing linked records. In other words, the ability for a form to have its Parent form submission, and one or multiple Child form submissions (for the linked records). See Fillout's solution as an example. Dummy scenario: If I want to submit information for a Family (Family table) and for the members of the Family (Members table) which can be one or multiple, I would not be able to do this from only one Airtable Form. I would need to submit one form for the Family information, and separate forms for each Member. How does is solve the user problems? Would avoid having to integrate different softwares, build dirty automations, or handling re-directs, just for the sake of creating linked records. How was this validated? This issue comes up with plenty of my clients, multiple questions have been asked on the Community on how to handle this, and it has been a topic of discussion with fellow builders and consultants. However, I'm not sure whether it has been actually submitted as a "New Idea"/Feature Request (if it was already, I'm super sorry -however it might be useful to bring it up again!). Basically, Airtable forms do not allow to create NEW linked records from the form itself (i.e. we can currently only select from a dropdown of already existing linked records). There are obviously several different workarounds such as: (i) using other form softwares (e.g. Fillout which I really love, but is still a pain to need additional integration just for this); (ii) handling the creation of new linked fields from interfaces rather than forms (i.e. would mean treating the interface itself as a pseudo form); (iii) having temporary fields on the main table which are only used to push data via an automation for the creation of the linked field (super dirty solution which I would almost never recommend); and (iv) others. However, all of those solutions are far from ideal. Who is the target audience? Airtable users who need to capture information via forms for a base with multiple linked tables (I'd say almost every Airtable user). Thanks!!
... View more
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Mar 06, 2023
12:27 PM
Submitted by
Sara
on
‎Mar 06, 2023
12:27 PM
![8 - Airtable Astronomer 8 - Airtable Astronomer](/html/@8B0B6143080A349E4F5B6E12C21C6051/rank_icons/Rank-Astronomer.png)
What is the proposed idea/solution? I would like to share an interface with a person that hasn't an Airtable account. How does is solve the user problems? In this way people without an account could see only that interface (not the base) through a link. Who is the target audience? All people that work with external customers. A lot of people commented about this idea here: https://community.airtable.com/t5/interface-designer/how-show-an-interface-without-airtable-account/m-p/144399/highlight/true#M1257
... View more
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Jul 29, 2024
12:30 PM
Submitted by
McKenzie_Joss
on
‎Jul 29, 2024
12:30 PM
![5 - Automation Enthusiast 5 - Automation Enthusiast](/html/@8E0586A35C6D0D07EA6A610CF7AEF6BF/rank_icons/Rank-AutomationEnthusiast.png)
The old interface layout allowed you to have 2 colors to pick from for the background. The new interface is only light grey. It would be very helpful to be able to have several background colors to pick from to distinguish key areas. It would be nice to be able to adjust fonts, bold, italic, etc.
... View more
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Aug 22, 2024
08:21 AM
Submitted by
Alyssa_Hitchcoc
on
‎Aug 22, 2024
08:21 AM
![5 - Automation Enthusiast 5 - Automation Enthusiast](/html/@8E0586A35C6D0D07EA6A610CF7AEF6BF/rank_icons/Rank-AutomationEnthusiast.png)
What is the proposed idea/solution? In interface page layouts, add the ability to collapse groups so that the header is visible but the fields nested beneath are not. An added bonus would be the ability to select whether a group is expanded or collapsed by default in the page template.... How does is solve the user problems? I have several interface page views that are quite long, and not all groups are applicable to all records. Allowing me to collapse the groups that are not relevant would make it easier for me to see and edit the most important information efficiently. How was this validated? This is generally accepted as useful functionality and exists in other places in the Airtable app. Google docs just recently added this functionality as well. Who is the target audience? Anyone using interface page views with many forms/groups
... View more
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Sep 22, 2024
05:39 PM
Submitted by
Kelsey_Stefans1
on
‎Sep 22, 2024
05:39 PM
![5 - Automation Enthusiast 5 - Automation Enthusiast](/html/@8E0586A35C6D0D07EA6A610CF7AEF6BF/rank_icons/Rank-AutomationEnthusiast.png)
What is the proposed idea/solution? Hide the large image/space in an interface when no records match a view's filters. Currently when there are no records, it actually takes up much more visual space than if there is one matching record. How does is solve the user problems? Hiding or condensing this visual would make it much easier for users/clients/readers to scroll a page quickly and see relevant information
... View more
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Dec 19, 2023
03:44 PM
Submitted by
benburne
on
‎Dec 19, 2023
03:44 PM
![6 - Interface Innovator 6 - Interface Innovator](/html/@781FA7B006C69ED0612A0090F8465157/rank_icons/Rank-InterfaceInnovator.png)
What is the proposed idea/solution? The proposed solution is to enable interface creators in Airtable to add images to an interface during the design process. This feature would allow the inclusion of static imagery, such as logos, background images, instructional graphics, or decorative elements, directly into the layout of Airtable Interfaces. The aim is to enhance the aesthetic appeal and instructional clarity of these interfaces. How does it solve the user problems? This feature addresses the need for more visually engaging and informative interfaces. By allowing creators to add relevant images, it makes interfaces more intuitive and tailored to specific use cases. For instance, a logo can reinforce branding, instructional images can guide users through complex datasets, and decorative elements can improve the overall user experience, making data interaction more enjoyable and efficient. How is this validated? Validation for this feature can come from user feedback, requests, and the observed trends in interface design across other platforms. Users who seek to create more personalized and visually appealing interfaces often express the need for such capabilities. Additionally, benchmarking against other data management tools that offer advanced interface customisation options, including imagery, can further validate the need and effectiveness of this feature.
... View more
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Sep 20, 2024
12:52 PM
Submitted by
Jasonl2l
on
‎Sep 20, 2024
12:52 PM
![5 - Automation Enthusiast 5 - Automation Enthusiast](/html/@8E0586A35C6D0D07EA6A610CF7AEF6BF/rank_icons/Rank-AutomationEnthusiast.png)
I think a key missing feature is the ability to embed items into an interface. I think this could take one of two (or both) forms. 1. A field that functions kind of like a "document" field. You insert an embed link. When viewed in a base, or in a grid/list view, it just shows as a preview - But when viewed in a record details pane - it translates to a custom sizable-embedded page. Each record's embedded view is based on the link in the field - just like the Button field type. 2. A "hard-coded" form - kind of like the difference between the "button field type" and the buttons you can set up in an interface. In the from-scratch interface builder - there would be a new element type called "Embed" where you could manual populate to with whatever embedded link needed. For example a google doc - or a news feed, etc. This by itself would accomplish half of the ideas that users have been putting forward for new automation triggers and integrations.
... View more
Status:
New Ideas
Submitted on
‎Jun 21, 2024
10:47 AM
Submitted by
Jason_Knighten1
on
‎Jun 21, 2024
10:47 AM
![8 - Airtable Astronomer 8 - Airtable Astronomer](/html/@8B0B6143080A349E4F5B6E12C21C6051/rank_icons/Rank-Astronomer.png)
To whom it may concern, An enhancement suggestion from Kalypso: In Interfaces, add more background color options and allow adding background color to single elements including list views, Grid, views, etc. that are not grouped with other elements. Alternatively or additionally, enable full background color capabilities that all elements sit on top of Expected Benefits: Improved aesthetics for Interfaces. Please consider adding this capability. Regards, Jason Knighten
... View more