I know we now have shareable blocks which is great. What i’d like to do is be able to share/embed a dashboard containing many blocks. The idea is to use something like https://screen.cloud and embed the dashboard as “one page” of the digital signage to be displayed on a large TV in the office. It seems that Airtable creates a specific “shareable” link when a block is shared. Normal Airtable links will not embed in the same way. I’m hopeful we can add this feature and curious how others have found solutions to share the information in their Airtable dashboards on TV signage? ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? It would be very useful to be able to select multiple records in timeline view. This would allow you to move multiple bookings at once, in the case of needing to adjust all bookings in a week/two week period by one day. A common scheduling requirement.  How does is solve the user problems? Because otherwise you have to move bookings one day at a time, which is very time consuming. How was this validated? ... Who is the target audience? Anyone handling complicated bookings or task management.  ... View more

Would love the capability to reorganize opened records. SmartSuite came out with this functionality and it is very clean and user friendly. They also have sections which would help to default collapse certain sections that I don’t need to see such as my calculations running in the background that are only used to for formulas and automations being run. SmartSuite’s sections structure is clean and a good example of what would work well. ... View more

Would it be possible to make it impossible to create blank records in Airtable - it’s so easy to create these that bases become littered with them. It’s even worse if you accidentally add a record in a grouped view because linked record are created which are otherwise blank. One way to do this would be to give the user the option of making one or more fields ‘required’ - and without them the record would not submit. I find having to constantly delete such empty records quite annoying! ... View more

It would be incredibly useful to me if Airtable was to become HIPPA compliant and be willing to sign Business Associate Agreements. http://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/business-associates/ ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? Allow questions on forms that are multi-dimensional, like this https://community.airtable.com/t5/other-questions/multiple-choice-grid-on-forms/td-p/81080 How does is solve the user problems? This will prevent fatigue from users who otherwise have to fill out multiple questions with the same sets of answers i.e. a series of statements that all have the same set of answers to select "strongly disagree, disagree, neither agree/disagree, agree, strongly agree" Who is the target audience? We are an enterprise account who uses AirTable for our program evaluations, for our thousands of program participants to fill out their evaluations ... View more

I want to use the interface as a place to invite my clients to collaborate with me, right now the level of personalisation is ok but needs more. Let me show you an example to explain how amazing the improvement would be by allowing a banner image on top of the interface   Look how nice the interface looks by adding just a header image :D!!! I really need this feature, willing to use it soon with my clients 🙂 there are others, such as, allowing more colours (or a personalised palette) within the buttons and number boxes. That would be awesome to make everything match to my branding colours. Also, at some point, if you allow to charge subscription to our clients to have access to the system on a monthly basis that would be AMAZING! that way I can rest in peace as I know all my clients will use the system and pay on a regular basis for it :)! ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? I propose to add a way to organize tables by groups as MS Access does. Currently tables in a base are organized by tabs in a row on the top. I understand that this would be against the Excel-like feeling, where the workbook is organized in sheets, which are actually tabs. But I think MS Access way to organize the tables in groups is much better. This feature would get bases much more organized. For example I would create the following organization for my tables: 1) Entities groups. In each of these groups, I would put just the entities which I am dealing with to model my universe (for example, Student, Tuition for a school or Order, item for a procurement etc.) 2) Lookup Tables. All lookups that cannot be implemented with a single field dropdown list. For example a ROLE table which requires a field like Title, but also a description and maybe other fields like Hourly Rate etc. 3) Many-to-Many associations Tables. For all associations that need to be materialized, because you need to record information for each association. For example, when you assign a parking to a car. The association table is the place where to store the arrival date/time and departure. Table types 2 and 3 are quickly proliferating and pollute the data model led by the tables that deal with pure entities. How does is solve the user problems? I would suggest to implement it as a toggle to the interface, so that the users could switch between the two layouts as they wish. Excel-like (tabs in a row) or Access-like (groups of tabs in a side column).  How was this validated? MS Access actually adopts this way to organize multiple tables. Who is the target audience? Airtable users who works directly with tables and base designer. ... View more

Unless Im missing it, I would like the ability to lock changes to fields in a base and/or records. Would help prevent accidental deletion. I discovered several days later I had done this… ... View more