I get it - really I do, if you want all your records in a table to be referred to as something else.
But I want to just fix mine to go back to being 'records' instead of 'events'
Solved
Minor nit - trying to fix - When the base re-names generic record to something else
+19Best answer by ScottWorld
Yeah, it's an extremely poorly-implemented feature.
Not only does it make its own random guesses on your behalf, but also you can't even choose your own terminology if it doesn't exist on their predefined list of 40 nouns. 🤷🏻♂🤦🏻♂
You have to go into the "rename table" option to remove the wrong record naming convention that they automatically applied for you.
+35Yeah, it's an extremely poorly-implemented feature.
Not only does it make its own random guesses on your behalf, but also you can't even choose your own terminology if it doesn't exist on their predefined list of 40 nouns. 🤷🏻♂🤦🏻♂
You have to go into the "rename table" option to remove the wrong record naming convention that they automatically applied for you.
+19Yeah, it's an extremely poorly-implemented feature.
Not only does it make its own random guesses on your behalf, but also you can't even choose your own terminology if it doesn't exist on their predefined list of 40 nouns. 🤷🏻♂🤦🏻♂
You have to go into the "rename table" option to remove the wrong record naming convention that they automatically applied for you.
Thank you Scott! I knew I had seen it somewhere but have no clue. Too many half thought out features without solid use case implementation.
Login to the community
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.