Skip to main content

Event recap: Build donor reports you're actually proud of | June 24

  • June 24, 2026
  • 3 replies
  • 36 views

MaddieJ
Forum|alt.badge.img+25

We just wrapped one of our most second NPO Builder Crew session, and if you missed it, the recording is embedded below. Close to 100 builders joined from across the globe (Belgium, Guatemala, Fairbanks, The Bahamas, and everywhere in between!) to dig into how Airtable can make grant reporting less painful and more credible.

Our host ​@Pello, founder of Moonland (LinkedIn), walked us through a live build of a grant and donor reporting system, including outcomes tracking, budget vs. actuals, and AI-assisted narrative drafting. Keep reading below the recording for the recap! 

 

What we covered

Pello showed a full nonprofit reporting base live, showing how Airtable connects grant data, program outcomes, and financial tracking in one place. Highlights from the session:

  • Linking indicators and outcomes directly to specific grants, so reports can be filtered to a single funder rather than pulling everything at once
  • Tracking budget vs. actuals with expense data entered manually or pulled from connected tools like QuickBooks
  • Using rollup fields to aggregate outcomes across programs and time periods
  • Building donor-facing interfaces with filters, graphics, and simplified views for different audiences
  • Using AI fields to verify data and draft funder-ready narrative reports, with a clear review checklist built into the output

The AI prompt Pello used

One of the most-requested moments from the session was the Omni prompt Pello used to generate a first-draft donor report. Here it is in full, and check out another prompt from Pello in the comments below. 

You're helping Brightpath Foundation draft a donor report. Below is the data for one grant, pulled straight from our system. Write a first-draft narrative report for the funder, something a program officer can then edit and finalise.

Data:
Indicator: Youth women trained in vocational & digital skills
Grant: Northwind Youth Employment Grant

Write it in this structure:
Executive summary (3-4 sentences), Results against targets (narrate the headline indicator in plain language), A story from the field (work in the beneficiary story and quote), Financial summary (one short paragraph on budget vs actual), Challenges and lessons learned (honest, not glossy)

Tone: warm but credible, concrete, no jargon or overclaiming. Funder-facing.

Then, at the end, add a short "For the team to review" list with 3-4 bullets flagging where a human should add detail, verify a number, or make a judgement call (e.g. "confirm Q3 placement figures," "add a second beneficiary voice if you have consent").

 

Resources from the session

Questions that sparked great conversation

A few threads that came up and are worth continuing in the crew:

  • How do you handle reports that span different grant timelines (June-May vs. October-September)?
  • Can filters on an interface be locked for all users, or are they personal? (Short answer: both, depending on how your admin configures the view.)
  • What's the best way to connect accounting tools like QuickBooks to pull in live expense data?

Bring these to the crew! The NPO Builder Crew is already over 100 members strong and this is exactly the kind of conversation it was built for.

Want to go deeper? Reach out to Pello directly if you're looking for hands-on help building grant tracking bases, interfaces, or automations for your organization.

See you at the next one.

3 replies

Pello
Forum|alt.badge.img+11
  • Inspiring
  • June 25, 2026

Thanks everyone for joining! If you’d have any question, don’t hesitate to comment here or send me a DM.


  • New Participant
  • June 25, 2026

Thanks again for the great session. Could you please share the prompt you used for the “AI Verify” data review? Thanks!


Pello
Forum|alt.badge.img+11
  • Inspiring
  • June 25, 2026

@Chris_GG here you go (see below). In the demo, I set the output type for the field agent to “Single select” with two options 1) Verified 2) Not verified. Kindly note that this prompt would alow more combinations.

You are a verification assistant tasked with confirming the accuracy of progress data. Your role is to ensure that the progress value is correctly justified using the provided documentation.

To execute this task, carefully review the progress value and its associated unit. Cross-reference these with the justification document to determine if the progress is accurately reported.

Output format:
Choose the single option that best verifies the progress value.

Context and Data:
Progress:
Unit:
Justification:

Output:

 

Hope that helps!