I want to build a database and give selective access for users to view and update certain records and fields. I don’t want to give them full access to the whole base, for privacy reasons and to prevent people from getting confused and making changes in the wrong places. Right now it seems like it’s all of nothing, but I’m not sure. The View Only and Form modes don’t work for me, as this doesn’t let people view the relevant data on a particular record, and update notes and specific information about that particular record. Is there a way to create a view and only share that view and all of its non-hidden fields for editing? If not, please add that feature! Or airtable will no longer work for our purposes. Thank you! ... View more

In working with the Organization Chart Block, it would be really neat if we could just embed the block dashboard view instead of having to have the entire base embedded in a website. It would help our site look a lot cleaner. Thanks! ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? I wish our fields could be grouped when working in views ex) all pricing fields could be hidden at once, or all visible, with one click instead of death scrolling all fields How does is solve the user problems? We have over 100 fields, many of which have a hierarchical relationship we don't have access to. It makes scrolling through all our fields complicated, and our employees get lost and feel confused. How was this validated? There is an unlimited amount of fields we can add, organizational tools would be very helpful Who is the target audience? Bases with a lot of fields, complex formulas, or multiple teams working within the same table ... View more

I paid for the pro version specifically for this feature and the fact that it wastes my prospects time by saying “you will be redirected in a few seconds to xyz url” makes this feature almost redundant because I don’t want people dropping off before they’re tagged on the next page with my facebook/google tracking pixels so I will have to use another software like typeform or jotform just because of this… ... View more

We have a lot of bases in our workspace it would be great if workspaces supported groups. So you could group your bases in the same workspace. ... View more

A very useful feature to have would be the ability to “drill-down” another level when working with Look-Up fields. We use AirTable to manage our company E-mail accounts and Distribution Lists (Distribution Lists are email addresses that contain members and distribute messages to all who are assigned to it, i.e. info@company.com can go to John, Mary, and Paul). Here is the basic set-up between 3 tables: Table PEOPLE contains a list of all employees, and links to EMAIL which contains all email addresses (including distribution lists) Table EMAIL links to DIST LISTS DIST LISTS contains a lookup field to list the names of people on each distribution list. I am running into this problem: because a distribution list’s members can contain OTHER distribution lists, I cannot get a comprehensive list of all members wherever this happens (which is often). For example (using arbitrary email addresses)… say "info@company.com" has 2 members: john.doe@company.com and hr@company.com "hr@company.com" has 2 members: jane.doe@company.com and jim.doe@company.com. The lookup field will only give me “John Doe” as a name as it doesn’t drill-down another layer to lookup the names under hr@company.com. I managed to set-up a second level of “Sub-Members” with some linking (a bit too complicated to explain here), but it would be so helpful to have the ability to look-up a second layer. I know this sounds complicated - I did my best to try and explain in the most simple way I could! ... View more

Field: Button | Action: Trigger Airtable Automation The ability to trigger an Airtable Automation that has a webhook trigger step. ... View more

I would like to have the ability to take an existing record in a table and apply all of its fields to a new record template. This would be an extremely useful feature, and honestly, I'm not quite sure why it isn't already possible. ... View more

Would love the ability to pre-fill all form fields using URL parameters. Currently some fields have parameter support (see this Support post for details), but not all. The ability to pre-fill linked fields with parameters could be super useful as people use Airtable to build web applications. ... View more