At the moment our process for job applications is the following: Create a job application on Jotform Connect Jotform submissions through Zapier to appear on Airtable Review the applications on Airtable Why not directly create the forms on Airtable? Because: Airtable doesn’t allow to section the form into different steps Airtable doesn’t allow to add images to the questions eg. we sometimes want to ask applicants to review software codes and we can’t attach a picture of the code for people to look at to answer the corresponding question Looking forward to perhaps see those features in the next update! It would save a lot of time and be very useful :pray: ... View more

Thanks for a great product! I have created a fair number of automations and my list is growing longer and longer. Unfortunately, they are shown in order of when they are created, and so the list is a mess. It would be nice to be able to reorder the list manually so they are shown in a manner that makes sense to the creator. Adding the ability to put them in folders would be nice too, but I won’t get greedy. Thanks again for a great product. I love Airtable! ... View more

Not sure if this belongs here, but it’s technically a product suggestion, so I thought I’d say it! There’s a whole group of people who 1) use Airtable casually but prolifically, for personal use, on the free plan 2) would love the ability to use more colors 3) can’t afford the insanely high $20/month for the Pro plan. Color options are a tangible, immediate improvement to any base that most users go looking for. (Airtable knows this—there’s a reason the “Colors” button is prominent in the toolbar!) I think that if Airtable offered a flat fee for color options alone, it would greatly improve the experience of some of us free users. As for what Airtable stands to gain here: to put it bluntly, they could make money that they wouldn’t otherwise. Those of us who can’t afford a recurring $20/month and just want colors aren’t going to, say, give in once the desire becomes strong enough, and subscribe for a month or two or something; they’re going to look at the fact that it’s a recurring payment (higher than Netflix!), see that it’s infeasible, and write it off as an impossibility. So, that’s $0. However, if someone sees that it’s, say, $10, once (affordable!), and uses personal spreadsheets a lot…they’ll probably think it’s worth it, and go for it. I know I would. It’s not $20/month, but if free users weren’t actually going to take the $20/month option anyway, it’s still worth it for Airtable. (And in case Airtable is somehow worried about losing Pro users: given all the other features that Pro users get, I don’t think they’re paying $20/month for just colors.) Of course, I haven’t done the market research, so I don’t know. But I think it might at least be worth it for Airtable to ask its prolific free users what flat fee they would be willing to pay for color options alone. And, if any free users agree with me here on the forum, it might bolster my case that this is worth investigating… :winking_face: ... View more

This happens a lot: I create a view using a filter. I’d like to add records to the view. But I’ve lost the ability to see the filtered out records, so I can’t edit them without going to another view. Wanted: an affordance to let me see the filtered out records - inactive. I.e. they could be sorted to the bottom, greyed out. Then I could edit them and have them appear ‘active’ in the view. ... View more

Hunting for Fields is my #1 time waster in Airtable. I spend lots of time scrolling horizontally through column headings, or vertically through the Fields Pane. I have 5x more fields than I do Views in most Tables and I interact with them (i.e. need to find them) more often too. Why not add the “Sections” functionality for Fields, like the one that Views have? ... View more

I’d love to be able to have a chrome extension that functions like web clipper, but is just for simple lookups: I enter a value, and it looks up a record and return’s records and their field data for records where the inputted data appears in a set column. ... View more

Different fields should be shown on a card based on which column of a Kanban view they are on. How is this not a thing?! ... View more

I have been syncing tables into 1 table to combine projects into one view. I would like to be able to make updates to the records from the sync view. Can we have a feature we can tick a box on/off to lock/unlock the ability to change records from sync view? ... View more

The option to display more than just the primary field in calendar view would be really, really helpful! This is possible on timeline view, so why not here? Currently my primary field looks messy in other views because it has to include additional information that I need to see on the calendar. I have seen others request this feature in the past but no changes have been made. ... View more