Skip to main content

Would love the ability to share an individual record by URL and to control the permissions on who can access the record with that link {anyone with the link, any logged in Airtable user with the link, specific Airtable users}.

Yes, would love this feature.


Also, slightly different, but would love to be able to create and send a URL that links directly to a form prefilled for one record.


For instance, I want to collect references for users, but I dont want the reference giver to have to select (from all our users) the one to give a few.


I want this to be automated.

This feature is definitely on our radar.


A short-term solution would be to email a record, or to create a new view with only one record in it and share that (perhaps you could make this view with only one record in it by making a checkbox field?).


How would having the ability to send out shareable links to single records fit into your workflow? Would you want to send out one record at a time to a few different people occasionally, or would you be doing in in huge batches and want it to be semi-automated (as these would be two different design experiences)?


It’s been 5 yrs! Please look into this useful feature! @Nenya_Edjah @Adam_Minich

It’s been 5 yrs! Please look into this useful feature! @Nenya_Edjah @Adam_Minich


@sic I appreciate the thought, but there’s nothing that I can do about this. I’m a fellow user, not an Airtable employee. Only users with the “Airtable” label by their username are employees.

We made a tool that makes a unique shareable URL for each record in your table. When the URL is opened, that single record is shown. We advertise it as an editor, but it can also be easily used as read-only. Any field can be turned into a read-only field by making a new field that is a formula that just shows the original field, and hiding the original field from the shared URL (supported by our tool).





This is an interesting solution but does not work for enterprise users as our IT department disables these types of add-ins. A built-in solution for this would be ideal.

Agreed with the others, this feels very basic, surprised this isn’t available yet!

Reply


Terms & Conditions