Give the option to make a phone number a clickable tel: link in Interfaces. Please add this very basic feature. ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? When using a bar chart, when a date field is selected as the X-axis, there should be an option to not only list all the dates for a record, but to think of that axis as a timeline, where all dates are represented not just ones that exist in a record. How does is solve the user problems? I want to track usage of an asset over time. The Y axis is usage in hours, the X axis is a date, the records contain a field for date and a single time for hours. There are many days when the asset is not used. I would like those blank days to be reflected in X-axis; I do not want to work around that would have a record for every day, records only exist for days where there is usage. How was this validated? ... Who is the target audience? Users who have date fields whose records do not contain all of the dates in a given time period, who would like a true timeline view but for data that varies over time where a timeline chart is insufficient. ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? Add an element to the Interface Designer similar to the "filter" element, but for sorting How does is solve the user problems? I have a gird element that many users use. They all look up records differently. Just want the easiest and most convenient way for them personally How was this validated? The Filter element works so well already! A sort by capability would be great too! Who is the target audience? Anyone that have multiple users viewing one Interface  ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? Allow placing a record picker element in the record review interface layout How does is solve the user problems? I currently have to create a ton of linked record fields in the table when I could have just had a record picker element. I think this was available before the update, but I can't quite remember. ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? Would be nice to have the ability to include images directly to the interface, let's say I'm building a client portal, and I want some kind of design on it, perhaps a large banner to say hello to my client portal interface, or perhaps to separate a section with a small image that says Files or archives, to have buttons that guide to documents attached or linked to that certain user... How does is solve the user problems? Allowing more personalisation within the interface panel, right now is a tad limited from the design perspective, I',m wishing to use it on a daily basis with my clients :)!... How was this validated? ... Who is the target audience? people that want to make the interface for their clients better looking 🙂 ... View more

We are currently consolidating our style guide in Airtable. It would be of great help if a new HEX field and a new COLOR field were introduced to use as a design color for fields, text, shapes or backgrounds in interfaces. The new COLOR field would then display the color of a selected HEX field, both in tables as in interfaces. Along that same line it would be great if Admins could define global HEX colors for the entire workspace, so these colors can be used to brand the user experience for everyone. These custom colors would then show up as a custom color list everywhere in Airtable, where colors can be used/selected. ... View more

To whom it may concern, An enhancement suggestion from Kalypso: In List view, enable ability to add a Frozen Column line similar to Grid View. Should allow placing it where desired same as Grid View. Expected Benefits: Improved functionality by allowing users in List view to see the primary record names when scrolling to right. Please consider adding this capability.  Regards, Jason Knighten ... View more

I’d like to request the ability to add new linked records in interface forms. I use forms for adding data and I need to be able to create new linked records. this is a huge limitation at this time. ... View more

User/collaborator fields are kind of a hot mess. It shows 100% of all users, including deactivated users, as options to select. What is the point of user groups if we can't make this a feature to limit options based on a user group? This would allow us to setup multiple user fields for a project and allow each team to manage their team assignments, with only a list of those options on their teams. Then using kanban or timeline view, you would be able to see only the lanes/groups of those in your team for workload balance, etc. Currently when a user selects a user field, they see 100's of users to choose from. And even worse, in a kanban view they see lanes for all 100's of users. Not even an option to limit by only users with projects assigned. So unless you have an extremely small number of collaborators the kanban view is useless for using collaborator field. ... View more