What is the proposed idea/solution? When a user creates a form, they have the option to "See who responded to form option". Considering the user who clicks on the form may not have an Airtable account just yet, it seems logical to me that the user who does sign up, and used an Airtable form to submit a response, the primary account holder (read, person whom is paying the bill) of the workspace ought to receive a referral fee for anybody who signs up as a result of filling a form with this option enabled. How does is solve the user problems? This helps the user know that by distributing forms to a larger community, not only can they have more accurate representations of whom is using their forms, but also help the larger community as a whole by being incentivized to onboard more people onto the platform, and thus reduce their workspace costs. How was this validated? I did a quick search using perplexity.ai and found, according to the search results, this is not possible.  Who is the target audience? Anybody who pays for an Airtable workspace. ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? Hey, I would like to propose a feature that makes it possible to add a condition to a field in a form, so that you can show/ hide the field depending on views of another table or an entry of a linked record How does is solve the user problems? this feature would make it possible to i.E. choose which Dokuments are to upload for a selected application  How was this validated? ... Who is the target audience? ... ... View more

Asking users to structure their base in a way that is conducive to Airtable's best practices falls short (requires workarounds like automations) when they would like a single form to contain EVERYTHING they need to capture during the intake process. Allowing users to ask the questions they need and manage their data properly without hacky solutions leads to a better user experience and understanding of how to get the most out of Airtable. What is the proposed idea/solution? Improve the form view to support creating new linked records and accessing linked record fields as questions on the form. Displaying these fields would depend on whether an existing or new linked record is desired by the submitter. How does is solve the user problems? It allows the base owner to ingest data in a way that is organized and structured relationally without relying on automations to duplicate data across tables or submitters submitting multiple forms in some required order. How was this validated? n/a Who is the target audience? base builders/everyone ... View more

Hi Airtable, We're transitioning more and more processes from Excel to Airtable and we're running into some usability issues. For one, we're working with large datasets and my team is complaining about the low amount of data visible in Airtable views. A setting for Extra Short row height (or manual input) would make these large datasets much clearer. A setting for overall reduced padding would be another great addition. We currently zoom out the entire page, but this reduces readability of the text. ... View more

Within a Grid View, often as I'm searching through many fields within a table via the "hidden fields" drop-down, I'm needing to reposition those returned fields from the hidden fields menu, typically the fields that I'm toggling the visibility of, I'm usually needing to move the fields to the first position of the table (or perhaps the last). Can we please have a toggle added on each field returned that allows users to quickly reposition their fields (to first or last) whilst the field search is active within the hidden fields - Grid View? And toggling the first/last button won't close/cancel out the hidden fields menu either, allowing for multiple operations to be carried out sequentially. Find field(s), toggle then to first and last, find different fields, toggle them to first and last, rinse repeat without the dialogue closing between each toggle. Screenshot below, hopefully this explains my request;   ... View more

It would be great if we could get the barcode scanner working in forms. ... View more

The product is called "Survey Redirect" and it is a custom Airtable field that allows users to create surveys and questionnaires within their Airtable bases. The form includes a new field type called "Redirect Field", which can be used to redirect users to different URLs based on their responses to a given question. Here's how it works: Create a new table in your Airtable base for your survey questions. Add a "Redirect Field" to your table, which will be used to redirect users based on their responses. When creating a new question, select the "Redirect Field" type and enter the possible responses along with their corresponding URLs. For example, if the question is "What is your favorite color?", the possible responses could be "Red", "Blue", or "Green", and the corresponding URLs could be "www.example.com/red", "www.example.com/blue", and "www.example.com/green". When someone fills out the survey, they will be redirected to the appropriate URL based on their response. This product idea could be useful for businesses and organizations that want to create customized surveys for their clients or customers, and need a way to redirect users based on their responses. For example, I have a project prospect form that it's only for new company's projects, if the project is alreay on going, I need to redirect the user to another form especific for additives or changes.   ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? When a form is being filled, and a linked value is chosen, I should be able to see other linked values based on that choice.  How does is solve the user problems? The primary key of a lot of the linked values are Codes / IDs etc.  Once that is chosen, it would be nice to display some related fields to make sure the person is choosing the right values   Example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxc5j4EQio8 ... View more

This request is for the emails generated when a form submission is received via a View Form. The email is typically titled "Airtable forms: someone has responded to..." Receiving this email is very useful when a new submission form has been received. However, the email contains both the filled out details of each question but also, and unnecessarily, the field names that have been hidden within the form and not filled out. This then prevents the user from applying their own email filters to the email. For example, I only want to filter emails where submissions have only answered certain questions - but as the submission notification email is filled with all of the fields the user didn't respond to, it's impossible to filter. I feel that a toggle would be welcome here, to remove these entries from the email if they're not being filled out. ... View more