What is the proposed idea/solution? ...For a Table with one or more Synced Tables, allow the User to Add Records. Options include Adding Records to the Current Table OR selecting a Synced Table to Add Records (must pick one table). How does is solve the user problems? ...In order to Add Records to one or more Synced Tables, the User must navigate away from the current Base to the Synced Table to add the Record, then navigate back to the Synced Table. This is information is hard to find in the User Interface since it is burred in the Table Drop Down > Update Sync Configuration Dialogue Box. Who is the target audience? ...All Users of Synced Tables that would like to add New Records. ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? ...Allow the User to "Add Records From" a Table within the current base. How does is solve the user problems? ...In order to bring together data from multiple Tables, they each need to exist in separate Base outside of the current Base. Without this feature, the User must create multiple Bases in order to combine multiple Tables into one Table. Who is the target audience? ...Every user who Syncs multiple Tables or wants to combine multiple Tables into one. ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? ...Allow copy and pasting "Options" and "Colors" from one Single Select or Multi-Select Field to another. How does is solve the user problems? ...Users have to manually enter "Options" and "Colors" for each Single Select or Multi-Select Field currently. This can be extremely time consuming and prone to human error, that can affect Multi-Syncs. Who is the target audience? ...All Users of "Single Select" or "Multi-Select Fields" across multiple Tables and / or Bases ... View more

In the View pane, the little gear in the search bar (above) grants the option of filtering out everyone's personal views—is there a way an option can be added to show only views that are being synced and/or shared? And maybe even something that gives people the option to exclude synced views from the list. Or maybe include a little indicator (a little pink asterisk or icon to match the "Share and sync" menu in the topbar, perhaps) next to View names? We have a lot of views and having a way to quickly see the views from which data is flowing out would be helpful. Right now I believe this kind of functionality is only available in the Share menu, which to me doesn't feel as intuitive and hampers visibility. ... View more

Not having this capability caused us to leave Airtable last year when looking to use it for planning, tracking, & communicating our go-to-market (GTM) projects. We are now giving it another try and having success for OKR management and want to again attempt using it for providing visibility into our GTMs. The calendar view need to enable us to see monthly, 2 months, quarterly, and annual views (at a minimum 2 and 3 months at time). This is critical for GTM planning & communications. It would enable us, as well as key stakeholders across the company to get a comprehensive view of upcoming launches and those identified for further out in the year. Without this capability, we may not be able to use this for planning, tracking, and communicating GTM projects. And no, the Timeline view does not meet this need very well… and if it did, it would also need to include the ability to publish the timeline view. ... View more

What is the problem this is addressing? When using forms, we use linked records to make selections - in our case - a certain product to be used when we build out a quote.  Unfortunately, the current setup on the forms is limiting the record name.  If a record name is extremely long, its getting cut-off and our estimators and sales are making incorrect selections because they don't know the full product name in the system. We can try to come up with abbreviations for many parts in the product name, but that can also lead to confusion and result in the wrong products being selected during the quoting process, producing an inaccurate quote. What is the proposed idea/solution? There are 3 options we can see that would address this issue. Let the record selection screen go wider based on the record names so they don't get cut off. Let the record selection screen wrap the record names, making the record deeper if needed to show the full name. Have the record selection in the live form actually match how it is displayed in the form builder -- to allow a more detailed view with the photo of the product as pictured. How does is solve the user problems? Any of these solutions/suggestions would allow for more details on a linked record to appear so that the correct record could be selected.  While I would hope to have option 3 as the solution with the visual representation being used to make sure we are selecting the correct records, Options 1 and 2 (I would assume) would be easier fixes that could be applied to address the problem. Who is the target audience? Our current audience, in our case, is internal usage for employees to select the correct records to compile quotes and work orders with the correct products.  Eventually, if something like option 3 was used, this could be used for order systems that are open to consumers and clients, allowing them to make a selection on what they see when words fail them, allowing a clear selection to the product and allowing for more error proof ordering. ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? Suggestion of a new view type, Map view, this view would allow me to upload an image file (a map), make records and place the records onto the map. This would be an X,Y, coordinate field within the record.   How does is solve the user problems? This would help me when documenting / auditing equipment installed at a customer site! I would now be able to assign a physical location to each record and visually present a map with icons representing each item placed onto the map. How was this validated? I don't know. Who is the target audience? At the moment I am thinking Wi-Fi engineers, but this could also be attractive to anybody trying to record physical location data. ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? I wish our fields could be grouped when working in views ex) all pricing fields could be hidden at once, or all visible, with one click instead of death scrolling all fields How does is solve the user problems? We have over 100 fields, many of which have a hierarchical relationship we don't have access to. It makes scrolling through all our fields complicated, and our employees get lost and feel confused. How was this validated? There is an unlimited amount of fields we can add, organizational tools would be very helpful Who is the target audience? Bases with a lot of fields, complex formulas, or multiple teams working within the same table ... View more

I paid for the pro version specifically for this feature and the fact that it wastes my prospects time by saying “you will be redirected in a few seconds to xyz url” makes this feature almost redundant because I don’t want people dropping off before they’re tagged on the next page with my facebook/google tracking pixels so I will have to use another software like typeform or jotform just because of this… ... View more