Airtable Standard API Add endpoint to duplicate a Base Settings Choose Workspace Duplicate Records Duplicate Comments ... View more

Hi everyone! Wanted to share a big update we made for Airtable users. Today we added the ability to: 2-way sync between two Airtable bases! 2-way sync between Airtable and Notion! About Whalesync Whalesync is a no-code tool that lets you 2-way sync data between Airtable and other apps. How it works Choose the Airtable bases and/or Notion databses you want to sync Map the tables/fields to each other Choose sync direction (2-way or 1-way) and turn on real-time sync (tutorial video) About the updates Our Airtable x Webflow sync has been live for a while now, so we’re still very much learning the best ways to take advantage of these new capabilities. If you have any feedback, we’d love to hear! ... View more

Amazing Airtable team, please give us folders to organize those Automations. I have about 50 and have to plow through them. Ideally I would like to organize the automatons into folders and (in my case) I would name the folder similarly as the tables names where the automations are being used. That would make it easier to find the right automation I am looking for. ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? Delete records using Automation. I want to move data from Table A > Table B. Currently there's no way without scripting to be able to do such a simple operation. Given that you can right click to delete a record, I'm shocked that this basic functionality is missing. How does is solve the user problems? Avoids major workarounds for what I would consider in a data management tool, to be core functionality. How was this validated? ... Who is the target audience? Everyone ... View more

Currently when writing in right to left languages (Hebrew, Arabic etc.) the text is shown pretty poorly when the text includes English or punctuation marks. ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? As it's possible to pre-fill a View Form field - it would be useful if field permissions could be set to prevent the user from editing specified (pre-filled) fields - the idea being that the field is read-only and is simply relaying information to the user who's filling out the form. Currently, if the field permissions within the table are set to "Nobody" can edit - a user viewing and filling out a form can still edit that field. How does this solve the user problems? It allows pre-filled forms to be sent and filled out by users, but only desirable fields are editable, whilst others fields are restricted from editing and will display pre-filled data that can't be edited - but can be viewed during the form process. Who is the target audience? Anyone who is using an Airtable automation to send a Form Link, with pre-filled URL switches, where some fields should really be non-editable and view only. ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? Add a sorting option to the Group function associated the Record List interface (for example.) This option would be available when grouping by a Single Select List and would allow you to order the groups the same as they are ordered in the list. How does is solve the user problems? Currently you can sort Groups alphabetically or reverse alphabetically. This prevents Groups from being a useful way to organize sequential groupings of data, or results in the user including the sequence in the name of the group (e.g. "1. Shutting down warp core"; "2. Disconnecting primary coupler", etc), which is not ideal to manage and may be confusing if the field is used elsewhere in the interface. record_list.jpg shows the interface's record list with the groups collapsed so that you can see the order (alphabetical) single_select_list_order.jpg shows the order of the list and the order I would like the groups to appear group_sort_options.jpg is where one might expect to see another sort option. Tight fit! Thanks for your consideration. ... View more

UPDATE 2: last modified time is now available to everyone! You can learn more about it here. UPDATE: The last modified time beta is now closed as we get ready for a general release. Thanks to all of the testers who made this beta a success. ORIGINAL POST: Hi folks! We’re very excited to announce that we’re beta testing a last modified time field type, as well as a LAST_MODIFIED_TIME formula function. Many thanks to the users who’ve posted specific, detailed feedback about their needs and use cases with regard to this feature, like @Arlo_Haskell, @Deborah_Buck, and @Jordan_Friedman. We read everything that is posted here in the forums and your feedback is incredibly valuable for us when we’re planning the product roadmap and developing new features! If you’re a Pro plan user and you’re interested in testing out the last modified time field type and/or the LAST_MODIFIED_TIME formula function—and giving us your feedback—please sign up using this form. (Note: this is a different form from our standard beta signup form, and it requires you to fill out a couple of additional questions.) As you are all aware, this is a highly anticipated feature, and there are many users who would like to get beta access. However, for technical reasons and to ensure an optimal user experience, rollout for this beta will be conducted in small, limited batches. (In practical terms, that means that it might take a while for you to get access.) ... View more

It would be helpful if we were able to duplicate an entire dashboard and also be able to share only the dashboard with others - today if we share the link to a dashboard the person only see it if we give them the access, at least as read-only to the entire base. ... View more