It would be great if I could search/filter/sort/group based on comments. Is that an option that I’m just not aware of how to use? ... View more

How can Airtable Enterprise Audit Logs be sufficient when they exclude record-level revision histories?  This seems like a MASSIVE oversight.  Am I missing something else here? Original article: https://community.airtable.com/t5/development-apis/reading-revision-history-via-script/td-p/37318 ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? At times, there comes a need to solve View Form and Silo'd base limitations by "chaining" two forms together (both from different Bases) with a redirect from the first form to the second. This is overly useful when data resides in two separate bases, but needs to be collected from both and placed into the final form of Base B. Useful for situations where Base Sync is not desirable (such as the Base Sync inflating the record numbers in the sync'd base to unacceptable numbers).  Thankfully, by using the View Form re-direct, Form A can then load Form B. When Form B is finished, a script Automation can return the Form A record (from Base A)  and update the newly created Form B record (that resides in Base B). But... the redirect message that prompts the user to wait whilst between forms is confusing, the wait is annoying. TLDR; I'd like to see an option to remove the View Form redirect wait and message, and allow a more seamless user experience upon Submitting Form A whilst redirecting them to Form B. Those familiar with Microsoft Forms would know the concept of "Sections", and I'm hoping a Redirect option can be added to "mimic" each Form being a section.   How does is solve the user problems? When the user finishes the first form, the redirect process confuses them as it loads the next form. I'd like to either hide the redirect message, or at least have full control over the message to indicate that Section 1 of 2 has been completed, as the next Form loads. Who is the target audience? Anyone using Airtable Form redirects that want to have control over the Redirect Message and the Redirect timeout.  ... View more

in the ‘button’ field type, I’d love to see an option to include a secondary confirmation button on click of the main button. This would prevent bad consequences related to accidental clicks on buttons. Most of the time, the buttons I include in my tables trigger quite elaborate automations and I’d like a simple way to make sure that my users don’t accidently press the button and trigger a cascade of unwanted changes. The confirmation window could even include a customizable message for the user. ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? ...Make the expanded record display more functional by adding 2 columns that you can rearrange fields and create multiple sections to hide fields that are rarely used. How does is solve the user problems? ... Makes working with data easier and better work flows How was this validated? ...Simliar to how Smartsuite is set up Who is the target audience? ...Everyone ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? It would be a game changer when working with hierarchical data for the roll-up field's ARRAYUNIQUE(values) function to return clickable linked record values instead of a comma-separated string when aggregating a linked record field from the source table. Currently, users can only represent one level of a linked record hierarchy as linked record values using lookup fields without risking duplicate linked record values. Multi-selected linked record lookups/roll-ups can lead to confusing UX and fewer group-by options. How does is solve the user problems? This would serve as a workaround for the strange user experience that occurs when using a roll-up field to return a lookup field of multi-selected linked records. This can duplicate of the same record referenced in the roll-up/look-up field. How was this validated? For example: Let's say you have a base with three tables containing linked records in this hierarchy: Dashboards -> Data Sources -> Tables and you want to see a list of Dashboards related to each Table. In Tables, you would normally create a lookup field to a linked record field in Data Sources that is linked to Dashboards. The duplicated values problem occurs when a single table record is linked to multiple data source records, which are also linked to multiple dashboard records. This results in duplicated dashboard records appearing in your lookup field (which creates confusing UX in general, but also makes grouping by this field even more problematic than usual for multi-selects). Who is the target audience? Intermediate base builders, everyone. ... View more

The search functionality (if I am not mistaken) currently indexes only across actual columns in each table / base. In case users frequently use the comment function on records (e.g. sales teams), would be great if the search function also indexes comments on each record. ... View more

Commenting would be far more helpful if it behaved in Airtable as it does in products like G Suite and Office 365 – comments can be resolved and therein no longer displayed as an action item (in the case of Airtable denoted by the small number in the far left column of the record). ... View more

Hi airtable! I have a list (an array) of items in two columns. Each row represents two different lists (one in each column). I’d like to be able to compare the two columns and remove what is common in both. For example Row 1: Column 1: Apple, Orange, Pineapple, Kiwi Column 2: Apple, Kiwi Result: Column 3: Orange, Pineapple Row 2: Column 1: Banana, Orange, Grape, Kiwi, Pineapple, Passion Fruit Column 2: Orange, Grape, Pineapple Result: Column 3: Banana, Kiwi, Passion Fruit etc. The general functionality is to be able to compare (two or more arrays) and perform some kind of action. Is this something that could be worked on? Let me know if you’d like more details. There are a few other posts here from people who have similar requests and ideas: Removing specific values from arrays (this is mine in support) Array intersect formula Using Rollup to check on completed tasks? ... View more