We use RabbitMQ a lot to take action when certain record events happen. For example, when users are created in a table, this sends a message which triggers account creation in other systems. At the moment, we use scripting automations to send POST requests to our RabbitMQ HTTP API. This is cumbersome, and there's no way to listen to events without creating webhooks. We would love first-class AMQP integration in Airtable. This would look like: In automations, the ability to send an AMQP message with a routing key and payload Ability to listen to an AMQP topic and take action ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? Allow users to edit certain fields directly from the Kanban card without needing to open the card. Currently the only field that can be edited is the single select field that groups the cards (a user can drag and drop the card and edit that field). All other fields need to be edited by opening the record. This request is both for Views and Interfaces. How does is solve the user problems? For "Trello" minded users this is a must because they are used to making quick changes on a card without needing to leave the kanvan view. How was this validated? ... Who is the target audience? Kanvan / Trello minded users ... View more

Currently an automation can update records in another table of the same base, but it is not possible to update a record in another base. Please make this possible so that we don't have to depend on third-party solutions (e.g. Make/Zapier). Thank you! ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? ...It would be very helpful to have kanban views be able to open to collapsed cards.  I have two views that are great and useful,  How does is solve the user problems? ...but collapsed cards would limit the amount of time searching for the desired one. How was this validated? ...by the time that it takes to search for the kanban, or time it would take to collapse all the cards Who is the target audience? ...everyone who has kanban views that contain large amounts ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? Make the Page Designer extension bi-directional. How does is solve the user problems? This would allow a user that creates reports from records to make changes to a record and the resulting report directly on the report itself.  You could then potentially make edits to hundreds of fields on a record from a single page view that is highly customizable.  I find there is far too much scrolling required when there are many fields that need to be filled in or changed, so the Page Designer extension seems like the easiest way to make the most customized and condensed views of a record as possible, and things like text fields, check boxes, and drop down fields could be very easily manipulated from this type of view. How was this validated? ... Who is the target audience? Users that create reports from records ... View more

In Interface designer, when I am configuring my record detail, I keep trying to re-order them the way I do in views by dragging and dropping in the list butwhen I click the row it pulls it off the list. Might be a change to make it not look like that fields option or to let you move fields in that way. ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? ... How does is solve the user problems? At the moment, Page Designer cannot successfully or easily do the following: - Attach a generated letter to the AirTable record - Allow for multiple pages in a letter - Built-in creation for company headers and footers--be able to input Corporate logo. - Template creation -- being able to create a letter that has a ready place for an address line, sent date, etc. How was this validated? ... Who is the target audience? Companies working with generating letters to clients ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? At the moment, you cannot readily access the Page Designer through Interface when trying to implement a button. How does is solve the user problems? I would like staff to be able to generate letters in AirTable, but they work out of the Interface, exclusively. How was this validated? ... Who is the target audience? ... ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? As it's possible to pre-fill a View Form field - it would be useful if field permissions could be set to prevent the user from editing specified (pre-filled) fields - the idea being that the field is read-only and is simply relaying information to the user who's filling out the form. Currently, if the field permissions within the table are set to "Nobody" can edit - a user viewing and filling out a form can still edit that field. How does this solve the user problems? It allows pre-filled forms to be sent and filled out by users, but only desirable fields are editable, whilst others fields are restricted from editing and will display pre-filled data that can't be edited - but can be viewed during the form process. Who is the target audience? Anyone who is using an Airtable automation to send a Form Link, with pre-filled URL switches, where some fields should really be non-editable and view only. ... View more