It would be great to be able to perform functions like duplicate, hide, delete, etc. for more than one column at once. You can select multiple but as soon as you right click, it deselects. ... View more

Hi - I’m a lender and would like to use page designer to generate monthly statements for my borrowers. Ideally these are easily converted to pdf and saved in an attachment field for each record in a view. Right now there is no easy way to do this except for printing each separately and adding manually, or printing all records, splitting, and then uploading. We could save to an attachment field using a template and Formstack integration, but there are a couple limitations. No table view for linked fields and Formstack pricing is based on the number or merges, which would start to add up quickly. To share the statements with our borrowers, we’ll use Stacker so they can login to their portal and access the statements. ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? It should be possible to use detail view templates across interfaces if they are based on the same table, e.g., I have one interface that shows products and one interface that shows tasks and tasks are linked to products. Within the product interface I allow users to click into the details of the linked tasks and currently I have to recreate my task detail view across interfaces. How does is solve the user problems? I'd save time as I don't have to recreate detail views that I've already set up // I wouldn't have any discrepancies between detail views.  How was this validated? We have this issue constantly and are experiencing increased workload through this Who is the target audience? Builders ... View more

The Airtable Electron app—like many others, but not all (see Slite’s app)—lacks support for checking spelling errors as you type. Look, I’m gunna level with you… I suck at spelling. But, I’d rather not have everyone else know it. If you could add spell check support you’d be doing me a solid. Thanks! ... View more

Increasing the number of automations in a base was awesome! They doubled, which saved me from having to find other solutions. I’m VERY thankful for that. Increasing storage based on plan would be an incredible next step. The pricing structure versus what you get for storage has a huge disparity. Free plans get two Plus gets five Pro gets twenty And enterprise gets one thousand. Pro is in need of a horsepower upgrade - we use Airtable enough to need enterprise, but its price is a cliff. I think the storage should be somewhere around this per base: Free plans get two Plus gets twenty Pro gets fifty And enterprise gets one thousand. I’d take more, but that feels like an absolute minimum. I’d love a way to increase storage on a base, or at least have an option for 100gb or so that we would want so that we don’t have to think about storage or the logistics of hosting it elsewhere. As a database, it is supposed to be our one source of truth. This makes it way easier having the media we need hosted here. A 20gb limit hamstrings that intention. Sure, it’s solved with more bases, but that is annoying and confusing for the end user. ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? In the shared view while viewing  a workspace, we want to be able to see the base descriptions.  How does is solve the user problems? Viewing base descriptions is easy for onboarding new members of our team and visualizing easily what base is used for what. How was this validated? ...with your team Who is the target audience? our team ... View more

Airtable Automation Action Add an Airtable Automation Action to Duplicate a Record. Settings Record ID Choose which fields to duplicate (ALL, NONE, Select Subset) Example Create a template record that can be cloned via an Automation. ... View more

Hello, can we please request the ability to create an expandable section block within the long-text field type when formatting is turned ON? Why this is useful: If I have a long text that spans multiple lines, I want the ability to “minimize” it so I can create sections in my notes, some that are expandable. ... View more

While it's possible to autofill a "User" field type using the "Current User" that's logged into an Interface, it is not possible to auto-link a Linked Record using the currently logged in user.  Use case: We have a custom table of our users that contains a number of fields including the user's email address. We would like to have the option to autofill (set the default value) of a linked record to the current user that's creating a new record in an Interface form. Currently the user has to select themselves out of the list and this adds an extra step to creating a new record and introduces opportunity for data entry errors (e.g. mistakenly selecting a similarly named user) Example 1: Shows the properties of a User field where "Current user" is selected as the Default Value Example 2: Shows the properties of a Linked Record where there is no option to use the Current User as a default value to auto select the correct linked record. ... View more