What is the proposed idea/solution? When fields are placed on an interface page, allow it to display a comparison, such as 'x% greater,' to the summary for that field with defined filters (min, max, median, average, etc.). Having a small visual indicator like an up or down arrow would also be helpful for glanceability.  How does it solve the user problems? When creating record review pages, it would be useful to show how a record compares to others. In particular, for project tracking, it would be helpful to see if, for example, time to completion was 75% faster than the average for other projects in the table, or spend was 60% higher. It's also helpful for ICs to see how their work compares to other similar projects. Who is the target audience? Project managers, people managers, and individual contributors ... View more

To whom it may concern, An enhancement suggestion from Kalypso: The recent capability launched for "Conditional number color formatting in Interface Design" which allows conditional formatting of Number elements (See pic), is only enabled for pre-configured interfaces. Number elements in "Blank" interfaces, either existing or new, do not have the conditional number coloring function. Expected Benefits: Ability to benefit from conditional formatting in "Blank" interface layouts. Please consider adding this capability.  Regards, Jason Knighten ... View more

I would like to request a feature enhancement for the "Update record" action when configuring buttons within Airtable. Currently, when setting up a button to update specific fields, it is only possible to select static, pre-defined values. However, there is no ability to set dynamic field updates based on values in other fields. For instance, in my use case, I want to assign the value of the Assignee field based on the value of another field, Approving Manager, but I can only select a specific user. This limitation makes it difficult to create flexible automations and workflows that can adjust dynamically based on the content of the record. Proposed Feature: I propose adding the ability to dynamically set the value of a field (like Assignee) based on the content of another field in the same record (like Approving Manager). This would allow for much more powerful workflows and significantly reduce the need for manual intervention in automations. Benefits: Increased automation flexibility. Ability to automatically assign tasks to the correct team members without hardcoding values. Streamlined approval workflows where managers or approvers are dynamically assigned based on the content of other fields. I believe this feature would be incredibly beneficial for many users managing approval processes, task assignments, or other dynamic workflows. Thank you for considering this request. I look forward to seeing how this could improve Airtable’s capabilities. ... View more

Context: We are close to the maximum number of automation in our bases, we use a lot of interface buttons to launch automations Idea: Now that it's possible to link several buttons to a same automation, it would be interesting to be able to apply conditional logic based on the button clicked in the interface. This avoids the need for users to create an automation per button. ... View more

When offering a filter in an interface based on an 'email' field including the 'Current User' this is case sensitive.  If a user capitalizes a letter in their email address when signing up this possibly won't match exactly and the filter doesn't work as intended.  The idea here is to make this filtering to be not case-sensitive.     ... View more

Hello, I would like to have the abilty to add some computations in interfaces' pivot tables. Let us consider the following pivot table: User can filter the table with field "Group" and hence get different "vertical totals": I would like the ability to define % of each value against the vertical total in each column, hence to compute the share of value between each car maker. Thank you Pascal   ... View more

There greatly needs to be a filter in an interfaces Revision History. It should show as a pill next to the word Revision History, just like the filter pill shows on the new Record List interface. Or it could be next to the bell icon for changing the watching comments option.   This way if you are viewing revision history you can narrow in on a specific field(s) to see only those revisions.  ... View more

Hi everyone, Pello here from Moonland. As an Airtable Gold Partner, we've developed some highly advanced tools in Airtable, including comprehensive ERPs and other intricate systems. While Airtable has provided us with a robust platform, there's one enhancement that could significantly elevate the user experience: leveraging bulk selection within Airtable interfaces for automations. What is the proposed idea/solution? The idea is to enable the use of bulk selections, made after applying filters in Airtable interfaces, to trigger automations. Currently, bulk selection in interfaces is limited to native functions like deleting rows. Extending this capability to automations would allow for more seamless and efficient workflows. How does it solve user problems? This enhancement would greatly improve the user experience by eliminating the need for cumbersome workarounds, such as using additional checkboxes, which complicate the UI/UX. With this feature, users could quickly select filtered records and apply automations directly, streamlining processes and saving valuable time. How was this validated? The limitation of the current workaround has been consistently noted by users who require more intuitive and efficient ways to manage bulk data operations. The existing process can be cumbersome and detracts from the overall user experience. By enabling bulk selection for automations, Airtable could offer a much more refined and user-friendly interface. Who is the target audience? This feature would be especially beneficial for users managing large datasets or complex workflows, such as people working in logistics or manufacturing (who use Airtable as an ERP).  I’d love to hear your thoughts on this idea. Your feedback is invaluable as we strive to create more effective tools. Thanks for taking the time to read this post! Pello ... View more

What is the proposed idea/solution? In interface page layouts, add the ability to collapse groups so that the header is visible but the fields nested beneath are not. An added bonus would be the ability to select whether a group is expanded or collapsed by default in the page template.... How does is solve the user problems? I have several interface page views that are quite long, and not all groups are applicable to all records. Allowing me to collapse the groups that are not relevant would make it easier for me to see and edit the most important information efficiently. How was this validated? This is generally accepted as useful functionality and exists in other places in the Airtable app. Google docs just recently added this functionality as well.  Who is the target audience? Anyone using interface page views with many forms/groups ... View more