Base Design

Hello,I'm wondering if there's a workaround to import data into linked fields. For example, I'm importing monthly salary information to a data table and the employee name corresponds to the primary field of a different table. Airtable only imports the non-linked fields.Would it be possible to import the employee name as a different field then run a script to create the linked record ? Or any other ideas will be appreciated.Thanks,Mark 

Hello, I manage two different teams - Team A & Team B. Both of these teams have their own separate base with their own projects. How I capture all of their projects into one grid table without having to do manual entry? I would like to have them sync together since their projects can associate with eachother. 

I'm having a mental block on something, and I'm sure someone will point out the right way to do this, and I'll privately say "oh, of course", but for some reason the coffee and adderal hasn't kicked in yet....I'm trying to make a member contact form that has a link to a specific person to populate an email table.I have two tables:Member - a list of people including status, name, email address etc...Email - a table that has all the email fields that I use an automation script that takes certain status values "Send" and sends those out and changes the status. I use this script method instead of the pure automation because I have several other scripts that generate emails from templates to send emails out.We essentially have a wiki page with a page for each users's profile (for example: <Jeff's profile >. I want to have a link that uses id=record_id(

Hi there! We are trying to move our corporate budget tracking to Airtable. As an example, say we have $400 to spend, the sum of the rate would need to be subtracted from $400 ongoingly. Do you have any ideas on how to best do this without manually subtracting the sum from $400 every time?

Hi all!My team and I are using Airtable to store user research as we build out and iterate on different products within our org. One of our goals is creating a repository to reference research participants we've spoken with in the past to contact them more easily for future research. The goal of this base is two-fold: the first being a structured pool of participants to pull from, and the second is a collision map to make sure we're not pulling the same participant for several different projects and overloading them. Our project teams often aren't aware of who the other team is recruiting for research and this has happened a few times. In the participant repository base, my setup so far is 3 tabs, 1)Ongoing projects and their timelines, 2) Our staff members and 3)The participant database. I have a lookup field in the participant database tab that lists the projects a participant is involved with and another field with the status of those projects, whet

Our team has fallen deep into the airtable ocean! We love them and so do our clients...That said, we now have so many bases, tables, interfaces, etc. that it's getting difficult to remember where things are or who created what.I'm hoping that something already exists that will easily allow me to take and catalog all the various workspaces, bases, etc. easily without needing me to go into each one to create a new table(s) that have this information in it.If no extension or tool exists, perhaps someone could share a table structure they already use to maintain order in their chaos? I need to set up something quickly!

DATETIME_DIFF(  TODAY(),  {Fecha de nacimiento},  "years") & " años, " & (DATETIME_DIFF(    TODAY(),    {Fecha de nacimiento},    "months"  ) -   DATETIME_DIFF(    TODAY(),&nb

Hi, is there a way to colour the background of cells, or better whole columns? What I’m trying to do is categorize the columns into different sections in a large table. I guess it is not possible since the filter and sort features colour the background of the according columns. Is there some other way to categorize the columns? Many thanks in advance!

I would love the ability to add a color background to the cells in a particular column. This would greatly help in making the column standout. Is this possible? If not please add this functionality. It’s very easy in Excel. Thanks

Hello! I’m new to Airtable and could really use guidance on structuring a base to serve as the central hub for our content production and management. Currently, we use Asana for task management and Airtable as a content calendar, but the workflow between them is clunky and inconsistent. I’d like to consolidate everything into Airtable in the name of consistency, efficiency—and my sanity.Current Workflow ChallengesArticles: Articles are manually brought into Airtable only when it’s time to promote them, not immediately after being published. However, articles are often updated later (e.g., older articles being rewritten or reviewed). This creates inconsistencies because updates in Asana don’t always sync back to Airtable.Rewrites: Older articles that need rewriting go through a full workflow in Asana (essentially the same steps as creating a new article).Reviews: Recently publish

Hello everyone,I'm new to Airtable.I need to administer a standardized test consisting of several questions to several people every month.I would like to be able to record the answers so that I can follow the evolution of the answers over time and according to the people.I can create the list of questions and record the answers, but I can't create separate entities for each date on which the questionnaire is taken.Could you help?Thank you in advance for your help!

Hello there,I'm starting to migrate from an old Access database to Airtable.  Part of this Access DB was used to track a number of groups and the days/times they meet per week.The data is in two tables, Groups and Meetings.  Groups is just a list of groups which has a one-to-many relationship with Meetings which is a matrix of a time-of-day and day-of-week:It shows in a report like below.  The letters in the boxes are different meeting formats:I have imported the data into AT and linked the two tables.  The issue is that all of the time-of-day and day-of-week data is getting combined into fields.  I understand that

I want to use different colours for column headers to differentiate between those that must be changed manually and those that will automatically be updated from automation when certain conditions are met. Is this possible?

Hey all.I have tasks that are laid out and currently in one table - Milestones.  I have another table with Event names.The idea is each Event will have all the tasks in the Milestones/task listing table.  SO that when I group by each Event, the tasks can be worked on for THAT event, they're the same tasks, but need to be linked to each Event separately.  Does that make sense.I created a third table as a sort of junction table and created two linked fields, one for the Event and the Other for the Milestone/task listing.  The above table is the "junction table".  Did I need to do it this way?  Or just I've just added the task linked table in the FS Listings?Any ideas? 

I have two tables Properties list and Budget. In the Properties table, I have a user field that we can assign the property manager to that particular property and that manager is only able to view and edit the Budget(budget table) details belonging to the property.But in budget table has many records of multiple properties detail. But that particular property manager should be able to view and edit Budget details belonging to that property. The rest of the details can be visible or hidden but should not be editable.Is that possible?

Hello all,I'm wondering if it's possible to indicate certain records in a table as read-only. The idea is that once these records have been validated they should not be modifiable (except perhaps through a special procedure). It's for accountancy records that have been transferred to an external database and so should no longer be modifiable.Any tips or tricks anyone to achieve this?Thanks,Mark

Hiya!I'm trying to create a registration form to send out to external users, but want them to be able to see the remaining capacity of each event, to know if they can register for the event. I tried to do this via a lookup field and as a read only field to find that Lookup fields aren't supported in Forms and Read Only fields won't appear in the public facing form. Is there a work around for this?I have the form set up where if an event is at capacity it won't show in the form, but haven't found a way for it to not accept registrations causing the event to go over capacity, which is why I though the registrant seeing the remaining capacity would be helpful. For example:A teacher wants to register their class of 40 for one of our spring concerts. Their first choice is Concert A, but when they selects Concert A, they sees it only has 30 spots left, thus they should go with a different choice. [as it stands right now Concert A is still a choice since it

I have conditional visibility set for 2 fields in my form. One is working correctly, and the other is not. I  need to know what I am missing on the one that is not working correctly.Here is the one that is working correctly as it is in the form and what the conditions are: Here is the one that is not working correctly, as the Clients Location Link is still showing up when it should just  be the Love is Blinds Location Link:   Any help would be appreciated. 

I'm trying to create a new Base for Donor information. I've successfully created the new Base and everything seems to be syncing fine. However, I have been using just a Autonumber Field for the Original Donor Primary Field and have converted it to a Formula so I can include Donor names with the Serial #. Now, in the synced base, I am unable to assign the new Field as the Primary because it's synced. Is there a way to override this? Why doesn't the change in the original migrate to the synced Base?

I am so disappointed in the updated Record Review layout. My team was satisfied with the filtering and sorting available with the legacy element-based record review layout. I am trying to find a way to customize an efficient arrangement of fields, but all I can do now is list them one per row..? I don't want to have to look for an Airtable alternative just to build an attractive record browsing interface.

Hi there,I'm facing an architectural problem for which I haven't found a solution as of yet. This problem is linked to the way I handle revenue and payment depending on the client type – small company or big company.Here's how I decided to structure my database to handle revenue and payment for small companies:And here's how I decided to structure it to handle the workflow for big companies: But this leads me to the following problem in terms of database design. I could have found a solution to this problem by:breaking the [Revenue Items] – [Client Sessions] direct relationshi

Hi there,I am hoping to build a form which allows individuals to 'verify' the data we have on file for them. For example, say I have a phone number and an account number I want them to confirm. I have this data in a table, and want some way to have this in the form with a yes/no tickbox to allow them to confirm that the details are correct. However, using the prefill form links I am only able to get these as editable sections. I don't want users to be able to edit the prefilled entries but rather to just verify or not verify them as correct. Any pointers on how to achieve this would be greatly appreciated, thanks!

Hi, I'm facing an Issue with importing data into Airtable. I have date prepared in Google Sheets which I'm trying to import in 4 diffrent ways: just copying the range (data table) and pasting it, exporting the .csv file and trying to import it, exporting the .xlsx file and trying to import it and also via Google Sheet connection. I have tried diffrent types of date formats in Airtable. In all cases importing dates appear one day before the date, so that once I have the date (screenshot from Google sheets): TestDate2025-01-15while importing it appears to be (screenshot from Airtable):   Has anyone faced such issue?Thanks in advance, Best regards, P

I have a base with several tables and lots of linked records between the tables. It has become necessary for various reasons to move one of those tables to its own base.Is there a way to move that table to its own base while preserving all the linked records to the other original base?  I'm struggling to find a good example or guidance how to approach that.thanks!

We assign employees (N=65) to Job Type (N=5) and Job Title (N=many) every six months.Before we begin, we know the employees and the job titles.There are two phases: assignments and distribution.Assignment:I assign individual employees to individual job types and titles.Distribution:Employees get sent a list of their job assignments for the work period.We need to:Make sure that every employee has a job type and title.Make sure that every job title has an employee.What is the best set up for this kind of task? Is it just one big table? is it two tables (employees, jobs)?I FEEL like this is a job for linked records, but no matter how hard I try, I can't figure it out--I've been doing this on a spreadsheet but there's gotta be a better way (particularly because I have to do this twice per year).-Scott